Head to head
FullEnrich vs Lusha
As a data enrichment API, Lusha rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 73.7 to 72.5, a 1.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | FullEnrich | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 72.5 | 73.7 |
Specifications
| FullEnrich | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Waterfall email and mobile enrichment | Contact reveal inside sales workflows |
| Free tier | 50 free trial credits, no card | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) |
| Pricing | Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10) | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 5 languages |
Is FullEnrich better than Lusha?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Lusha rates higher (73.7 vs 72.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Lusha leads by 1.2 points (73.7 vs 72.5) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; FullEnrich wins 2.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 80 | 76 | |
| Reliability | 66 | 78 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 64 | 68 | |
| Accessibility | 80 | 72 |
Choose FullEnrich if… / choose Lusha if…
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 76)
- →accessibility matters most to you (80 vs 72)
- →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment
- →reliability matters most to you (78 vs 66)
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (68 vs 64)
- →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 50 free trial credits, no card
- Free trial$0
- Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
- EnterpriseCustom
- Model
- Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
- Free tier
- 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
- Free$0/mo
- Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
- Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
- Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
- Scale / customCustom
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich) and 2026-10-07 (Lusha).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 1
MCP server
Only FullEnrich · 4
REST API (v1, v2)OpenAPI specsZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrationsNo official SDKs found
Only Lusha · 4
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)Native connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
- +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
- +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
- –No official SDKs found
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
- –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth
- +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
- +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
- +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
- –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
- –No official language SDKs found
- –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint
FullEnrich vs Lusha: questions
- Which has better documentation, FullEnrich or Lusha?
- FullEnrich scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 76 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, FullEnrich or Lusha?
- Lusha scores higher on reliability: 78 vs 66 out of 100.
- Do FullEnrich and Lusha have a free tier?
- FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card). Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)).
- How are FullEnrich and Lusha priced?
- FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10). Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Both list 5 official SDKs.