Head to head

Apollo.io vs Lusha

As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 73.7, a 6.4-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

Lusha logo
Lusha
Lusha
C
73.7ABI / 100

Contact reveal inside sales workflows

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioLusha
Documentation & DX
80
76
Reliability
84
78
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
68
Accessibility
78
72
APIbenchmarks Index80.173.7

Specifications

Apollo.ioLusha
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentContact reveal inside sales workflows
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
Official SDKs6 languages5 languages

Is Apollo.io better than Lusha?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 73.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Apollo.io leads by 6.4 points (80.1 vs 73.7) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioLusha logoLushaWinner
Documentation & DX8076Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Reliability8478Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7868Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Accessibility7872Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Apollo.io vs Lusha API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 73.7; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 84 vs 78, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 68, accessibility 78 vs 72.
Apollo.io vs Lusha API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 73.7; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 84 vs 78, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 68, accessibility 78 vs 72.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose Lusha if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 76)
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 78)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 68)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (78 vs 72)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (6 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
Lusha logoChoose Lusha if
  • →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
Lusha logoLusha
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
Free tier
40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
  • Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
  • Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
  • Scale / customCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-07 (Lusha).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Apollo.io · 6
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only Lusha · 5
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)MCP serverNative connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
Lusha logoLusha
  • +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
  • +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
  • +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
  • –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
  • –No official language SDKs found
  • –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint

Apollo.io vs Lusha: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or Lusha?
Apollo.io scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 76 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or Lusha?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 78 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and Lusha have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)).
How are Apollo.io and Lusha priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5).
Which has more official SDKs?
Apollo.io lists 6 official SDKs, Lusha lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons