Head to head

Crustdata vs FullEnrich

As a data enrichment API, Crustdata rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 95.7 to 72.5, a 23.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Crustdata logo
Crustdata
Crustdata
A+
95.7ABI / 100

Real-time data for AI agents and sourcing

FullEnrich logo
FullEnrich
FullEnrich
C
72.5ABI / 100

Waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Criterion by criterion

CriterionCrustdataFullEnrich
Documentation & DX
96
80
Reliability
95
66
Ecosystem & SDKs
95
64
Accessibility
97
80
APIbenchmarks Index95.772.5

Specifications

CrustdataFullEnrich
Best forReal-time data for AI agents and sourcingWaterfall email and mobile enrichment
Free tierFree trial credits + free-forever tier50 free trial credits, no card
PricingPer credit (additive)Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Official SDKs5 languages5 languages

Is Crustdata better than FullEnrich?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Crustdata rates higher (95.7 vs 72.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Crustdata leads by 23.2 points (95.7 vs 72.5) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionCrustdata logoCrustdataFullEnrich logoFullEnrichWinner
Documentation & DX9680Crustdata logoCrustdata
Reliability9566Crustdata logoCrustdata
Ecosystem & SDKs9564Crustdata logoCrustdata
Accessibility9780Crustdata logoCrustdata
Crustdata vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 95.7 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 96 vs 80, reliability 95 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 64, accessibility 97 vs 80.
Crustdata vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 95.7 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 96 vs 80, reliability 95 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 64, accessibility 97 vs 80.

Choose Crustdata if… / choose FullEnrich if…

Crustdata logoChoose Crustdata if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (96 vs 80)
  • →reliability matters most to you (95 vs 66)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (95 vs 64)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (97 vs 80)
  • →your use case matches its focus: real-time data for ai agents and sourcing
FullEnrich logoChoose FullEnrich if
  • →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Pricing side by side

Crustdata logoCrustdata
Model
Per credit (additive)
Free tier
Free trial credits + free-forever tier
  • Free tier$0/mo
  • Real-time API AccessCredit-based / not publicly listed
  • Flat File DatasetsCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Model
Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Free tier
50 free trial credits, no card
  • Free trial$0
  • Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Crustdata) and 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
REST API (HTTP, primary interface)
Only Crustdata · 4
Official MCP server (Model Context Protocol)crustdata-mcp (community pip package)crustdata-screener-mcp (community package)Composio toolkit (Claude Code, Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK, Mastra AI)
Only FullEnrich · 4
OpenAPI specsMCP serverZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrationsNo official SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

Crustdata logoCrustdata
  • +Genuine real-time / live web indexing, returns data for untracked companies within minutes rather than serving stale batch data
  • +Watcher API + webhooks push change signals (job changes, funding, promotions) the moment they're detected
  • +Clean, fast, well-documented REST API that reviewers say makes integration 'almost effortless'
  • –Paid plan pricing is opaque, no named tiers or list prices published; heavier endpoints gated behind enterprise/demo requests
  • –Credit-based model can create unpredictable costs without active monitoring
  • –No first-party SDKs, integration is raw REST (client libraries are community/third-party only)
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
  • +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
  • +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
  • +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
  • –No official SDKs found
  • –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
  • –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth

Crustdata vs FullEnrich: questions

Which has better documentation, Crustdata or FullEnrich?
Crustdata scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 96 vs 80 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Crustdata or FullEnrich?
Crustdata scores higher on reliability: 95 vs 66 out of 100.
Do Crustdata and FullEnrich have a free tier?
Crustdata: yes (Free trial credits + free-forever tier). FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card).
How are Crustdata and FullEnrich priced?
Crustdata: Per credit (additive). FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10).
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 5 official SDKs.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons