Head to head

Apollo.io vs FullEnrich

As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 72.5, a 7.6-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

FullEnrich logo
FullEnrich
FullEnrich
C
72.5ABI / 100

Waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioFullEnrich
Documentation & DX
80
80
Reliability
84
66
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
64
Accessibility
78
80
APIbenchmarks Index80.172.5

Specifications

Apollo.ioFullEnrich
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentWaterfall email and mobile enrichment
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo50 free trial credits, no card
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Official SDKs6 languages5 languages

Is Apollo.io better than FullEnrich?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 72.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Apollo.io leads by 7.6 points (80.1 vs 72.5) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; FullEnrich wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioFullEnrich logoFullEnrichWinner
Documentation & DX8080Tie
Reliability8466Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7864Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Accessibility7880FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Apollo.io vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 80 vs 80, reliability 84 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 64, accessibility 78 vs 80.
Apollo.io vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 80 vs 80, reliability 84 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 64, accessibility 78 vs 80.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose FullEnrich if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 66)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 64)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (6 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
FullEnrich logoChoose FullEnrich if
  • →accessibility matters most to you (80 vs 78)
  • →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Model
Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Free tier
50 free trial credits, no card
  • Free trial$0
  • Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)
Only Apollo.io · 5
OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only FullEnrich · 4
OpenAPI specsMCP serverZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrationsNo official SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
  • +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
  • +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
  • +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
  • –No official SDKs found
  • –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
  • –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth

Apollo.io vs FullEnrich: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or FullEnrich?
Apollo.io and FullEnrich score the same on documentation and developer experience (80).
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or FullEnrich?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 66 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and FullEnrich have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card).
How are Apollo.io and FullEnrich priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10).
Which has more official SDKs?
Apollo.io lists 6 official SDKs, FullEnrich lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons