Head to head
Hunter vs Lusha
As a data enrichment API, Hunter rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 78.9 to 73.7, a 5.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Hunter | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 78.9 | 73.7 |
Specifications
| Hunter | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Email finding and verification for outreach | Contact reveal inside sales workflows |
| Free tier | 50 credits/mo, API included | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) |
| Pricing | Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification) | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) |
| Official SDKs | 4 languages | 5 languages |
Is Hunter better than Lusha?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Hunter rates higher (78.9 vs 73.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Hunter leads by 5.2 points (78.9 vs 73.7) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Lusha wins 1.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 84 | 76 | |
| Reliability | 80 | 78 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 66 | 68 | |
| Accessibility | 86 | 72 |
Choose Hunter if… / choose Lusha if…
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (84 vs 76)
- →reliability matters most to you (80 vs 78)
- →accessibility matters most to you (86 vs 72)
- →your use case matches its focus: email finding and verification for outreach
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (68 vs 66)
- →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 4)
- →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification)
- Free tier
- 50 credits/mo, API included
- Free$0
- StarterEUR 34/mo discounted (EUR 49 regular)
- GrowthEUR 104/mo discounted (EUR 149 regular)
- ScaleEUR 209/mo discounted (EUR 299 regular)
- Data PlatformFrom EUR 6,500
- Model
- Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
- Free tier
- 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
- Free$0/mo
- Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
- Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
- Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
- Scale / customCustom
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Hunter) and 2026-10-07 (Lusha).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 1
MCP server
Only Hunter · 3
REST API v2 (query, header or bearer key)OpenAPI JSONCommunity libraries only (npm hunterio, Ruby gem)
Only Lusha · 4
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)Native connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found
Strengths and weaknesses
- +API access included on the permanent Free plan
- +Published OpenAPI JSON and per-endpoint rate limits
- +Test API key for Domain Search, Email Finder and Email Verifier
- –No official SDKs found, community wrappers only
- –Narrow scope: strongest on work emails, weak on phones and non-public contacts
- –Free tier is only 50 credits/month
- +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
- +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
- +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
- –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
- –No official language SDKs found
- –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint
Hunter vs Lusha: questions
- Which has better documentation, Hunter or Lusha?
- Hunter scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 84 vs 76 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, Hunter or Lusha?
- Hunter scores higher on reliability: 80 vs 78 out of 100.
- Do Hunter and Lusha have a free tier?
- Hunter: yes (50 credits/mo, API included). Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)).
- How are Hunter and Lusha priced?
- Hunter: Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification). Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Lusha lists 5 official SDKs, Hunter lists 4.