Head to head

Apollo.io vs Hunter

As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 78.9, a 1.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

Hunter logo
Hunter
Hunter
B
78.9ABI / 100

Email finding and verification for outreach

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioHunter
Documentation & DX
80
84
Reliability
84
80
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
66
Accessibility
78
86
APIbenchmarks Index80.178.9

Specifications

Apollo.ioHunter
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentEmail finding and verification for outreach
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo50 credits/mo, API included
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification)
Official SDKs6 languages4 languages

Is Apollo.io better than Hunter?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 78.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Apollo.io leads by 1.2 points (80.1 vs 78.9) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Hunter wins 2.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioHunter logoHunterWinner
Documentation & DX8084Hunter logoHunter
Reliability8480Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7866Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Accessibility7886Hunter logoHunter
Apollo.io vs Hunter API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 78.9; documentation & dx 80 vs 84, reliability 84 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 66, accessibility 78 vs 86.
Apollo.io vs Hunter API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 78.9; documentation & dx 80 vs 84, reliability 84 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 66, accessibility 78 vs 86.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose Hunter if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 80)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 66)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (6 official SDKs vs 4)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
Hunter logoChoose Hunter if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (84 vs 80)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (86 vs 78)
  • →your use case matches its focus: email finding and verification for outreach

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
Hunter logoHunter
Model
Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification)
Free tier
50 credits/mo, API included
  • Free$0
  • StarterEUR 34/mo discounted (EUR 49 regular)
  • GrowthEUR 104/mo discounted (EUR 149 regular)
  • ScaleEUR 209/mo discounted (EUR 299 regular)
  • Data PlatformFrom EUR 6,500

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-07 (Hunter).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Apollo.io · 6
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only Hunter · 4
REST API v2 (query, header or bearer key)OpenAPI JSONMCP serverCommunity libraries only (npm hunterio, Ruby gem)

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
Hunter logoHunter
  • +API access included on the permanent Free plan
  • +Published OpenAPI JSON and per-endpoint rate limits
  • +Test API key for Domain Search, Email Finder and Email Verifier
  • –No official SDKs found, community wrappers only
  • –Narrow scope: strongest on work emails, weak on phones and non-public contacts
  • –Free tier is only 50 credits/month

Apollo.io vs Hunter: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or Hunter?
Hunter scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 84 vs 80 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or Hunter?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 80 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and Hunter have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). Hunter: yes (50 credits/mo, API included).
How are Apollo.io and Hunter priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). Hunter: Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification).
Which has more official SDKs?
Apollo.io lists 6 official SDKs, Hunter lists 4.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons