Head to head

FullContact vs FullEnrich

As a data enrichment API, FullEnrich rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 72.5 to 68.4, a 4.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

FullContact logo
FullContact
FullContact
C
68.4ABI / 100

Identity resolution / Identity Graph

FullEnrich logo
FullEnrich
FullEnrich
C
72.5ABI / 100

Waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Criterion by criterion

CriterionFullContactFullEnrich
Documentation & DX
70
80
Reliability
70
66
Ecosystem & SDKs
62
64
Accessibility
72
80
APIbenchmarks Index68.472.5

Specifications

FullContactFullEnrich
Best forIdentity resolution / Identity GraphWaterfall email and mobile enrichment
Free tier100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)50 free trial credits, no card
PricingPer matched API callPer successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Official SDKs7 languages5 languages

Is FullContact better than FullEnrich?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, FullEnrich rates higher (72.5 vs 68.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

FullEnrich leads by 4.1 points (72.5 vs 68.4) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; FullContact wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionFullContact logoFullContactFullEnrich logoFullEnrichWinner
Documentation & DX7080FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Reliability7066FullContact logoFullContact
Ecosystem & SDKs6264FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Accessibility7280FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
FullContact vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 68.4 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 70 vs 80, reliability 70 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 64, accessibility 72 vs 80.
FullContact vs FullEnrich API comparison: ABI 68.4 vs 72.5; documentation & dx 70 vs 80, reliability 70 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 64, accessibility 72 vs 80.

Choose FullContact if… / choose FullEnrich if…

FullContact logoChoose FullContact if
  • →reliability matters most to you (70 vs 66)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (7 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: identity resolution / identity graph
FullEnrich logoChoose FullEnrich if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 70)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (64 vs 62)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (80 vs 72)
  • →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment

Pricing side by side

FullContact logoFullContact
Model
Per matched API call
Free tier
100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
  • Developer (Free)$0
  • Growth$99/month
  • Basic~$500/month
  • Premium~$2,000/month
  • Enterprise$10,000+/month (custom)
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
Model
Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
Free tier
50 free trial credits, no card
  • Free trial$0
  • Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (FullContact) and 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only FullContact · 7
Go (official V3 client)Java 8 (official V3 client)Java 11+ (official V3 client)Python (official V3 client)Ruby (archived/legacy)PHP (archived/legacy)Postman collection
Only FullEnrich · 5
REST API (v1, v2)OpenAPI specsMCP serverZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrationsNo official SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

FullContact logoFullContact
  • +Multi-field enrichment: accepts many identifier types (email, phone, name+address, social URLs/usernames, MAIDs, plus Resolve PersonIDs) to lift match rates
  • +Deep attribute coverage, 900+ appendable data attributes via Person Insights Bundles (demographics, household, employment history, affinities, shopping habits)
  • +Tunable confidence: ML 'Belief Vector' lets callers set confidence thresholds per request to balance precision vs. match rate
  • –Real-world match rates often far below the advertised 93%, reviewers report ~40-50%, especially outside the U.S.
  • –Data-quality complaints of false positives in age, employment, and education fields, with no data-freshness timestamps on attributes
  • –Rate limit (~600 queries/min) too low for large batch enrichment jobs
FullEnrich logoFullEnrich
  • +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
  • +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
  • +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
  • –No official SDKs found
  • –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
  • –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth

FullContact vs FullEnrich: questions

Which has better documentation, FullContact or FullEnrich?
FullEnrich scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 70 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, FullContact or FullEnrich?
FullContact scores higher on reliability: 70 vs 66 out of 100.
Do FullContact and FullEnrich have a free tier?
FullContact: yes (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)). FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card).
How are FullContact and FullEnrich priced?
FullContact: Per matched API call. FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10).
Which has more official SDKs?
FullContact lists 7 official SDKs, FullEnrich lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons