Head to head

Bright Data vs FullContact

As a data enrichment API, Bright Data rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.3 to 68.4, a 11.9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Bright Data logo
Bright Data
Bright Data
B
80.3ABI / 100

Bulk public people and company datasets for data teams

FullContact logo
FullContact
FullContact
C
68.4ABI / 100

Identity resolution / Identity Graph

Criterion by criterion

CriterionBright DataFullContact
Documentation & DX
82
70
Reliability
80
70
Ecosystem & SDKs
82
62
Accessibility
76
72
APIbenchmarks Index80.368.4

Specifications

Bright DataFullContact
Best forBulk public people and company datasets for data teamsIdentity resolution / Identity Graph
Free tierFree dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
PricingPer 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commitsPer matched API call
Official SDKs5 languages7 languages

Is Bright Data better than FullContact?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Bright Data rates higher (80.3 vs 68.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Bright Data leads by 11.9 points (80.3 vs 68.4) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionBright Data logoBright DataFullContact logoFullContactWinner
Documentation & DX8270Bright Data logoBright Data
Reliability8070Bright Data logoBright Data
Ecosystem & SDKs8262Bright Data logoBright Data
Accessibility7672Bright Data logoBright Data
Bright Data vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 80.3 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 82 vs 70, reliability 80 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 82 vs 62, accessibility 76 vs 72.
Bright Data vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 80.3 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 82 vs 70, reliability 80 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 82 vs 62, accessibility 76 vs 72.

Choose Bright Data if… / choose FullContact if…

Bright Data logoChoose Bright Data if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (82 vs 70)
  • →reliability matters most to you (80 vs 70)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (82 vs 62)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (76 vs 72)
  • →your use case matches its focus: bulk public people and company datasets for data teams
FullContact logoChoose FullContact if
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (7 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: identity resolution / identity graph

Pricing side by side

Bright Data logoBright Data
Model
Per 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commits
Free tier
Free dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)
  • Dataset Marketplace (one-time)$250 for 100K records
  • Dataset subscriptionDiscounted refresh
  • Scraper API (pay-as-you-go)About $1.50 per 1,000 records
  • EnterpriseCustom
FullContact logoFullContact
Model
Per matched API call
Free tier
100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
  • Developer (Free)$0
  • Growth$99/month
  • Basic~$500/month
  • Premium~$2,000/month
  • Enterprise$10,000+/month (custom)

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Bright Data) and 2026-06-27 (FullContact).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
Python (brightdata-sdk)
Only Bright Data · 4
JavaScript SDKREST APIMCP server (remote, OAuth)Snowflake / S3 / GCS delivery
Only FullContact · 6
Go (official V3 client)Java 8 (official V3 client)Java 11+ (official V3 client)Ruby (archived/legacy)PHP (archived/legacy)Postman collection

Strengths and weaknesses

Bright Data logoBright Data
  • +Self-serve Search (sync, up to 1,000 records) and Filter (async snapshots) APIs
  • +Published $2.50 per 1,000 records with no charge for zero-match queries
  • +669M+ LinkedIn people profiles plus company and jobs datasets
  • –Public profile fields only; no verified emails or direct dials by default
  • –No free API tier for datasets; $250 minimum for 100K-record packages
  • –Enrichment emails/phones depend on a third-party partner
FullContact logoFullContact
  • +Multi-field enrichment: accepts many identifier types (email, phone, name+address, social URLs/usernames, MAIDs, plus Resolve PersonIDs) to lift match rates
  • +Deep attribute coverage, 900+ appendable data attributes via Person Insights Bundles (demographics, household, employment history, affinities, shopping habits)
  • +Tunable confidence: ML 'Belief Vector' lets callers set confidence thresholds per request to balance precision vs. match rate
  • –Real-world match rates often far below the advertised 93%, reviewers report ~40-50%, especially outside the U.S.
  • –Data-quality complaints of false positives in age, employment, and education fields, with no data-freshness timestamps on attributes
  • –Rate limit (~600 queries/min) too low for large batch enrichment jobs

Bright Data vs FullContact: questions

Which has better documentation, Bright Data or FullContact?
Bright Data scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 82 vs 70 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Bright Data or FullContact?
Bright Data scores higher on reliability: 80 vs 70 out of 100.
Do Bright Data and FullContact have a free tier?
Bright Data: yes (Free dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)). FullContact: yes (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)).
How are Bright Data and FullContact priced?
Bright Data: Per 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commits. FullContact: Per matched API call.
Which has more official SDKs?
FullContact lists 7 official SDKs, Bright Data lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons