Head to head
Fiber vs Lusha
As a data enrichment API, Lusha rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 73.7 to 69.9, a 3.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Fiber | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 69.9 | 73.7 |
Specifications
| Fiber | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines | Contact reveal inside sales workflows |
| Free tier | No | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) |
| Pricing | Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 5 languages |
Is Fiber better than Lusha?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Lusha rates higher (73.7 vs 69.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Lusha leads by 3.8 points (73.7 vs 69.9) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Fiber wins 2.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 80 | 76 | |
| Reliability | 60 | 78 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 74 | 68 | |
| Accessibility | 62 | 72 |
Choose Fiber if… / choose Lusha if…
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 76)
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (74 vs 68)
- →your use case matches its focus: agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines
- →reliability matters most to you (78 vs 60)
- →accessibility matters most to you (72 vs 62)
- →you want a free tier to start (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap))
- →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
- Free tier
- No
- Prospector$300/mo
- Growth$900/mo
- Enterprise$2,400/mo
- Bulk / datasetsFrom $1,000/mo (datasets)
- Trial$0 for 7 days
- Model
- Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
- Free tier
- 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
- Free$0/mo
- Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
- Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
- Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
- Scale / customCustom
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Fiber) and 2026-10-07 (Lusha).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 0
None
Only Fiber · 5
Node.js / TypeScript (@fiberai/sdk)Python (fiberai)REST API and OpenAPIMCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2, lite)First-party coding-agent plugin
Only Lusha · 5
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)MCP serverNative connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Official Node (@fiberai/sdk) and Python (fiberai) SDKs
- +Three MCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2 API key, lite) and a first-party plugin
- +Agent-native docs: per-operation markdown, llms.txt and openapi.json
- –No free tier; entry plan $300/month
- –Trial requirements conflict between homepage and pricing page
- –No confirmed official status page or SLA
- +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
- +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
- +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
- –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
- –No official language SDKs found
- –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint
Fiber vs Lusha: questions
- Which has better documentation, Fiber or Lusha?
- Fiber scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 76 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, Fiber or Lusha?
- Lusha scores higher on reliability: 78 vs 60 out of 100.
- Do Fiber and Lusha have a free tier?
- Fiber: no free tier. Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)).
- How are Fiber and Lusha priced?
- Fiber: Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans. Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Both list 5 official SDKs.