Head to head

Crustdata vs Fiber

As a data enrichment API, Crustdata rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 95.7 to 69.9, a 25.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Crustdata logo
Crustdata
Crustdata
A+
95.7ABI / 100

Real-time data for AI agents and sourcing

Fiber logo
Fiber
Fiber
C
69.9ABI / 100

Agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines

Criterion by criterion

CriterionCrustdataFiber
Documentation & DX
96
80
Reliability
95
60
Ecosystem & SDKs
95
74
Accessibility
97
62
APIbenchmarks Index95.769.9

Specifications

CrustdataFiber
Best forReal-time data for AI agents and sourcingAgent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines
Free tierFree trial credits + free-forever tierNo
PricingPer credit (additive)Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
Official SDKs5 languages5 languages

Is Crustdata better than Fiber?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Crustdata rates higher (95.7 vs 69.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Crustdata leads by 25.8 points (95.7 vs 69.9) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionCrustdata logoCrustdataFiber logoFiberWinner
Documentation & DX9680Crustdata logoCrustdata
Reliability9560Crustdata logoCrustdata
Ecosystem & SDKs9574Crustdata logoCrustdata
Accessibility9762Crustdata logoCrustdata
Crustdata vs Fiber API comparison: ABI 95.7 vs 69.9; documentation & dx 96 vs 80, reliability 95 vs 60, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 74, accessibility 97 vs 62.
Crustdata vs Fiber API comparison: ABI 95.7 vs 69.9; documentation & dx 96 vs 80, reliability 95 vs 60, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 74, accessibility 97 vs 62.

Choose Crustdata if… / choose Fiber if…

Crustdata logoChoose Crustdata if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (96 vs 80)
  • →reliability matters most to you (95 vs 60)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (95 vs 74)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (97 vs 62)
  • →you want a free tier to start (Free trial credits + free-forever tier)
  • →your use case matches its focus: real-time data for ai agents and sourcing
Fiber logoChoose Fiber if
  • →your use case matches its focus: agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines

Pricing side by side

Crustdata logoCrustdata
Model
Per credit (additive)
Free tier
Free trial credits + free-forever tier
  • Free tier$0/mo
  • Real-time API AccessCredit-based / not publicly listed
  • Flat File DatasetsCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)
Fiber logoFiber
Model
Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
Free tier
No
  • Prospector$300/mo
  • Growth$900/mo
  • Enterprise$2,400/mo
  • Bulk / datasetsFrom $1,000/mo (datasets)
  • Trial$0 for 7 days

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Crustdata) and 2026-10-07 (Fiber).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Crustdata · 5
REST API (HTTP, primary interface)Official MCP server (Model Context Protocol)crustdata-mcp (community pip package)crustdata-screener-mcp (community package)Composio toolkit (Claude Code, Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK, Mastra AI)
Only Fiber · 5
Node.js / TypeScript (@fiberai/sdk)Python (fiberai)REST API and OpenAPIMCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2, lite)First-party coding-agent plugin

Strengths and weaknesses

Crustdata logoCrustdata
  • +Genuine real-time / live web indexing, returns data for untracked companies within minutes rather than serving stale batch data
  • +Watcher API + webhooks push change signals (job changes, funding, promotions) the moment they're detected
  • +Clean, fast, well-documented REST API that reviewers say makes integration 'almost effortless'
  • –Paid plan pricing is opaque, no named tiers or list prices published; heavier endpoints gated behind enterprise/demo requests
  • –Credit-based model can create unpredictable costs without active monitoring
  • –No first-party SDKs, integration is raw REST (client libraries are community/third-party only)
Fiber logoFiber
  • +Official Node (@fiberai/sdk) and Python (fiberai) SDKs
  • +Three MCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2 API key, lite) and a first-party plugin
  • +Agent-native docs: per-operation markdown, llms.txt and openapi.json
  • –No free tier; entry plan $300/month
  • –Trial requirements conflict between homepage and pricing page
  • –No confirmed official status page or SLA

Crustdata vs Fiber: questions

Which has better documentation, Crustdata or Fiber?
Crustdata scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 96 vs 80 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Crustdata or Fiber?
Crustdata scores higher on reliability: 95 vs 60 out of 100.
Do Crustdata and Fiber have a free tier?
Crustdata: yes (Free trial credits + free-forever tier). Fiber: no free tier.
How are Crustdata and Fiber priced?
Crustdata: Per credit (additive). Fiber: Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans.
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 5 official SDKs.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons