Head to head
Fiber vs FullEnrich
As a data enrichment API, FullEnrich rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 72.5 to 69.9, a 2.6-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Fiber | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 69.9 | 72.5 |
Specifications
| Fiber | FullEnrich | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines | Waterfall email and mobile enrichment |
| Free tier | No | 50 free trial credits, no card |
| Pricing | Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans | Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 5 languages |
Is Fiber better than FullEnrich?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, FullEnrich rates higher (72.5 vs 69.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
FullEnrich leads by 2.6 points (72.5 vs 69.9) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Fiber wins 1.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| Reliability | 60 | 66 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 74 | 64 | |
| Accessibility | 62 | 80 |
Choose Fiber if… / choose FullEnrich if…
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (74 vs 64)
- →your use case matches its focus: agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines
- →reliability matters most to you (66 vs 60)
- →accessibility matters most to you (80 vs 62)
- →you want a free tier to start (50 free trial credits, no card)
- →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
- Free tier
- No
- Prospector$300/mo
- Growth$900/mo
- Enterprise$2,400/mo
- Bulk / datasetsFrom $1,000/mo (datasets)
- Trial$0 for 7 days
- Model
- Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 50 free trial credits, no card
- Free trial$0
- Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
- EnterpriseCustom
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Fiber) and 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 0
None
Only Fiber · 5
Node.js / TypeScript (@fiberai/sdk)Python (fiberai)REST API and OpenAPIMCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2, lite)First-party coding-agent plugin
Only FullEnrich · 5
REST API (v1, v2)OpenAPI specsMCP serverZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrationsNo official SDKs found
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Official Node (@fiberai/sdk) and Python (fiberai) SDKs
- +Three MCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2 API key, lite) and a first-party plugin
- +Agent-native docs: per-operation markdown, llms.txt and openapi.json
- –No free tier; entry plan $300/month
- –Trial requirements conflict between homepage and pricing page
- –No confirmed official status page or SLA
- +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
- +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
- +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
- –No official SDKs found
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
- –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth
Fiber vs FullEnrich: questions
- Which has better documentation, Fiber or FullEnrich?
- Fiber and FullEnrich score the same on documentation and developer experience (80).
- Which is more reliable, Fiber or FullEnrich?
- FullEnrich scores higher on reliability: 66 vs 60 out of 100.
- Do Fiber and FullEnrich have a free tier?
- Fiber: no free tier. FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card).
- How are Fiber and FullEnrich priced?
- Fiber: Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans. FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Both list 5 official SDKs.