Head to head

Clay vs Lusha

As a data enrichment API, Lusha rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 73.7 to 66.9, a 6.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Clay logo
Clay
Clay
C
66.9ABI / 100

Multi-provider enrichment orchestration

Lusha logo
Lusha
Lusha
C
73.7ABI / 100

Contact reveal inside sales workflows

Criterion by criterion

CriterionClayLusha
Documentation & DX
65
76
Reliability
75
78
Ecosystem & SDKs
60
68
Accessibility
68
72
APIbenchmarks Index66.973.7

Specifications

ClayLusha
Best forMulti-provider enrichment orchestrationContact reveal inside sales workflows
Free tierFree plan with limited credits (no card)40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
PricingData Credits + ActionsPer credit (email 1, phone 5)
Official SDKs1 languages5 languages

Is Clay better than Lusha?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Lusha rates higher (73.7 vs 66.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Lusha leads by 6.8 points (73.7 vs 66.9) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionClay logoClayLusha logoLushaWinner
Documentation & DX6576Lusha logoLusha
Reliability7578Lusha logoLusha
Ecosystem & SDKs6068Lusha logoLusha
Accessibility6872Lusha logoLusha
Clay vs Lusha API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 73.7; documentation & dx 65 vs 76, reliability 75 vs 78, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 68, accessibility 68 vs 72.
Clay vs Lusha API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 73.7; documentation & dx 65 vs 76, reliability 75 vs 78, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 68, accessibility 68 vs 72.

Choose Clay if… / choose Lusha if…

Clay logoChoose Clay if
  • →your use case matches its focus: multi-provider enrichment orchestration
Lusha logoChoose Lusha if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (76 vs 65)
  • →reliability matters most to you (78 vs 75)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (68 vs 60)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (72 vs 68)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 1)
  • →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows

Pricing side by side

Clay logoClay
Model
Data Credits + Actions
Free tier
Free plan with limited credits (no card)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Launchfrom ~$167–185/mo (annual)
  • Growthfrom ~$446–495/mo (annual)
  • EnterpriseCustom (annual commitment, ~$30k/yr+ typical)
Lusha logoLusha
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
Free tier
40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
  • Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
  • Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
  • Scale / customCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Clay) and 2026-10-07 (Lusha).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Clay · 1
No official client SDK libraries published; integration is via HTTP API node, webhooks, and native CRM connectors
Only Lusha · 5
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)MCP serverNative connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

Clay logoClay
  • +Waterfall enrichment chains 150+ data providers under one subscription, materially raising email/firmographic match rates versus any single source
  • +Combines enrichment, AI web research (Claygent), and signal monitoring (funding, hiring, job changes, tech installs) in one platform
  • +Spreadsheet-style table UI plus Clay University make complex multi-step enrichment accessible without code
  • –Dual credit/action model causes fast, hard-to-predict credit burn; auto-recharge billing reportedly fires without advance warning
  • –Steep learning curve, reviewers cite hours in week one and 2–3 weeks before workflows are reliable
  • –Phone/mobile number coverage is weak (~30–35% match rate)
Lusha logoLusha
  • +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
  • +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
  • +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
  • –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
  • –No official language SDKs found
  • –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint

Clay vs Lusha: questions

Which has better documentation, Clay or Lusha?
Lusha scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 76 vs 65 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Clay or Lusha?
Lusha scores higher on reliability: 78 vs 75 out of 100.
Do Clay and Lusha have a free tier?
Clay: yes (Free plan with limited credits (no card)). Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)).
How are Clay and Lusha priced?
Clay: Data Credits + Actions. Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5).
Which has more official SDKs?
Lusha lists 5 official SDKs, Clay lists 1.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons