Head to head

Apollo.io vs Bright Data

As a data enrichment API, Bright Data rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.3 to 80.1, a 0.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

Bright Data logo
Bright Data
Bright Data
B
80.3ABI / 100

Bulk public people and company datasets for data teams

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioBright Data
Documentation & DX
80
82
Reliability
84
80
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
82
Accessibility
78
76
APIbenchmarks Index80.180.3

Specifications

Apollo.ioBright Data
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentBulk public people and company datasets for data teams
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/moFree dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Per 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commits
Official SDKs6 languages5 languages

Is Apollo.io better than Bright Data?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Bright Data rates higher (80.3 vs 80.1). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Bright Data leads by 0.2 points (80.3 vs 80.1) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Apollo.io wins 2.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioBright Data logoBright DataWinner
Documentation & DX8082Bright Data logoBright Data
Reliability8480Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7882Bright Data logoBright Data
Accessibility7876Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Apollo.io vs Bright Data API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 80.3; documentation & dx 80 vs 82, reliability 84 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 82, accessibility 78 vs 76.
Apollo.io vs Bright Data API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 80.3; documentation & dx 80 vs 82, reliability 84 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 82, accessibility 78 vs 76.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose Bright Data if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 80)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (78 vs 76)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (6 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
Bright Data logoChoose Bright Data if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (82 vs 80)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (82 vs 78)
  • →your use case matches its focus: bulk public people and company datasets for data teams

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
Bright Data logoBright Data
Model
Per 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commits
Free tier
Free dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)
  • Dataset Marketplace (one-time)$250 for 100K records
  • Dataset subscriptionDiscounted refresh
  • Scraper API (pay-as-you-go)About $1.50 per 1,000 records
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-07 (Bright Data).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)
Only Apollo.io · 5
OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only Bright Data · 4
Python (brightdata-sdk)JavaScript SDKMCP server (remote, OAuth)Snowflake / S3 / GCS delivery

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
Bright Data logoBright Data
  • +Self-serve Search (sync, up to 1,000 records) and Filter (async snapshots) APIs
  • +Published $2.50 per 1,000 records with no charge for zero-match queries
  • +669M+ LinkedIn people profiles plus company and jobs datasets
  • –Public profile fields only; no verified emails or direct dials by default
  • –No free API tier for datasets; $250 minimum for 100K-record packages
  • –Enrichment emails/phones depend on a third-party partner

Apollo.io vs Bright Data: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or Bright Data?
Bright Data scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 82 vs 80 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or Bright Data?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 80 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and Bright Data have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). Bright Data: yes (Free dataset samples; new-account credits (unconfirmed for datasets)).
How are Apollo.io and Bright Data priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). Bright Data: Per 1,000 records ($2.50 CPM), plans/commits.
Which has more official SDKs?
Apollo.io lists 6 official SDKs, Bright Data lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons