Head to head

Geoapify vs OpenCage

As a maps & geocoding API, OpenCage rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 74.8 to 72.4, a 2.4-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Geoapify logo
Geoapify
Geoapify
C
72.4ABI / 100

Affordable OSM-based geocoding & maps

OpenCage logo
OpenCage
OpenCage
C
74.8ABI / 100

Pure forward/reverse geocoding

Criterion by criterion

CriterionGeoapifyOpenCage
Documentation & DX
75
80
Reliability
68
65
Ecosystem & SDKs
58
62
Accessibility
92
95
APIbenchmarks Index72.474.8

Specifications

GeoapifyOpenCage
Best forAffordable OSM-based geocoding & mapsPure forward/reverse geocoding
Free tier3k credits/day (free plan)2,500 req/day (free trial)
PricingPer credit (per req)Per day req tier (subscription)
Official SDKs9 languages12 languages

Is Geoapify better than OpenCage?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, OpenCage rates higher (74.8 vs 72.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

OpenCage leads by 2.4 points (74.8 vs 72.4) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Geoapify wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionGeoapify logoGeoapifyOpenCage logoOpenCageWinner
Documentation & DX7580OpenCage logoOpenCage
Reliability6865Geoapify logoGeoapify
Ecosystem & SDKs5862OpenCage logoOpenCage
Accessibility9295OpenCage logoOpenCage
Geoapify vs OpenCage API comparison: ABI 72.4 vs 74.8; documentation & dx 75 vs 80, reliability 68 vs 65, ecosystem & sdks 58 vs 62, accessibility 92 vs 95.
Geoapify vs OpenCage API comparison: ABI 72.4 vs 74.8; documentation & dx 75 vs 80, reliability 68 vs 65, ecosystem & sdks 58 vs 62, accessibility 92 vs 95.

Choose Geoapify if… / choose OpenCage if…

Geoapify logoChoose Geoapify if
  • →reliability matters most to you (68 vs 65)
  • →your use case matches its focus: affordable osm-based geocoding & maps
OpenCage logoChoose OpenCage if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 75)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (62 vs 58)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (95 vs 92)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (12 official SDKs vs 9)
  • →your use case matches its focus: pure forward/reverse geocoding

Pricing side by side

Geoapify logoGeoapify
Model
Per credit (per req)
Free tier
3k credits/day (free plan)
  • Free$0/mo
  • API 10$59/mo
  • API 25$109/mo
  • API 50$179/mo
  • API 100$299/mo
  • API 250 / Custom$609/mo; Custom from $860/mo
OpenCage logoOpenCage
Model
Per day req tier (subscription)
Free tier
2,500 req/day (free trial)
  • Free Trial€0
  • X-Small€45/mo
  • Small€110/mo
  • Medium€450/mo
  • Large€900/mo
  • Enterprise€1,800+/mo

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Geoapify) and 2026-06-27 (OpenCage).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
Python (official code samples)
Only Geoapify · 8
JavaScript / TypeScript (Geocoder Autocomplete library)React (@geoapify component wrappers)Angular (component wrappers)Node.js (Route Planner SDK, code samples)Leaflet integrationMapLibre GL integrationOpenLayers integrationQGIS integration
Only OpenCage · 11
Node.js / JavaScriptJavaPHPRubyPerlMATLABCommand-line (CLI)Leaflet pluginMCP serverGo (community)Rust (community)

Strengths and weaknesses

Geoapify logoGeoapify
  • +Cache-friendly licensing: OSM-based data may be stored/cached, unlike Google Maps which forbids it
  • +Unified, predictable credit pricing (1 geocoding request = 1 credit; map tiles = 0.25 credit) across all APIs
  • +Generous no-credit-card free tier (3,000 credits/day) usable for prototypes and light production
  • –OSM-backed accuracy can trail Google for rooftop precision and some addresses fail to resolve
  • –Lower tiers cap rate at 5-15 req/s, which can bottleneck very large dataset processing
  • –Modest 99.5% SLA and no prominent public real-time status page for transparent uptime reporting
OpenCage logoOpenCage
  • +Permissive open-data license: store and reuse geocoding results forever, even after cancelling, unlike Google/Mapbox
  • +Predictable flat-rate pricing with soft daily limits (no surge charges or hard cut-offs for subscribers)
  • +Single endpoint returns rich annotations: timezone, currency, calling code, sunrise/sunset, what3words, MGRS, confidence score
  • –Pure geocoding only, no routing, distance matrix, map tiles, or rich place search
  • –Coverage and accuracy thin in developing regions where OpenStreetMap data is sparse
  • –Fixed subscription tiers rather than true granular pay-as-you-go billing

Geoapify vs OpenCage: questions

Which has better documentation, Geoapify or OpenCage?
OpenCage scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 75 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Geoapify or OpenCage?
Geoapify scores higher on reliability: 68 vs 65 out of 100.
Do Geoapify and OpenCage have a free tier?
Geoapify: yes (3k credits/day (free plan)). OpenCage: yes (2,500 req/day (free trial)).
How are Geoapify and OpenCage priced?
Geoapify: Per credit (per req). OpenCage: Per day req tier (subscription).
Which has more official SDKs?
OpenCage lists 12 official SDKs, Geoapify lists 9.

Other Maps & Geocoding comparisons