Head to head

OpenCage vs TomTom

As a maps & geocoding API, TomTom rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.6 to 74.8, a 5.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

OpenCage logo
OpenCage
OpenCage
C
74.8ABI / 100

Pure forward/reverse geocoding

TomTom logo
TomTom
TomTom
B
80.6ABI / 100

Maps, routing & traffic

Criterion by criterion

CriterionOpenCageTomTom
Documentation & DX
80
76
Reliability
65
85
Ecosystem & SDKs
62
78
Accessibility
95
85
APIbenchmarks Index74.880.6

Specifications

OpenCageTomTom
Best forPure forward/reverse geocodingMaps, routing & traffic
Free tier2,500 req/day (free trial)50k tile + 2.5k non-tile req/day
PricingPer day req tier (subscription)Per 1k req (tile/non-tile)
Official SDKs12 languages5 languages

Is OpenCage better than TomTom?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, TomTom rates higher (80.6 vs 74.8). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

TomTom leads by 5.8 points (80.6 vs 74.8) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; OpenCage wins 2.

Winner by criterion

CriterionOpenCage logoOpenCageTomTom logoTomTomWinner
Documentation & DX8076OpenCage logoOpenCage
Reliability6585TomTom logoTomTom
Ecosystem & SDKs6278TomTom logoTomTom
Accessibility9585OpenCage logoOpenCage
OpenCage vs TomTom API comparison: ABI 74.8 vs 80.6; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 65 vs 85, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 78, accessibility 95 vs 85.
OpenCage vs TomTom API comparison: ABI 74.8 vs 80.6; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 65 vs 85, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 78, accessibility 95 vs 85.

Choose OpenCage if… / choose TomTom if…

OpenCage logoChoose OpenCage if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 76)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (95 vs 85)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (12 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: pure forward/reverse geocoding
TomTom logoChoose TomTom if
  • →reliability matters most to you (85 vs 65)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 62)
  • →your use case matches its focus: maps, routing & traffic

Pricing side by side

OpenCage logoOpenCage
Model
Per day req tier (subscription)
Free tier
2,500 req/day (free trial)
  • Free Trial€0
  • X-Small€45/mo
  • Small€110/mo
  • Medium€450/mo
  • Large€900/mo
  • Enterprise€1,800+/mo
TomTom logoTomTom
Model
Per 1k req (tile/non-tile)
Free tier
50k tile + 2.5k non-tile req/day
  • FreemiumFree
  • Pay As You GrowUsage-based (prepaid overage)
  • EnterpriseCustom contract

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (OpenCage) and 2026-06-27 (TomTom).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only OpenCage · 12
PythonNode.js / JavaScriptJavaPHPRubyPerlMATLABCommand-line (CLI)Leaflet pluginMCP serverGo (community)Rust (community)
Only TomTom · 5
Maps & Navigation SDK for AndroidMaps & Navigation SDK for iOSMaps SDK for JavaScript (TypeScript support)Navigation SDK for MobileREST APIs (language-agnostic / HTTP)

Strengths and weaknesses

OpenCage logoOpenCage
  • +Permissive open-data license: store and reuse geocoding results forever, even after cancelling, unlike Google/Mapbox
  • +Predictable flat-rate pricing with soft daily limits (no surge charges or hard cut-offs for subscribers)
  • +Single endpoint returns rich annotations: timezone, currency, calling code, sunrise/sunset, what3words, MGRS, confidence score
  • –Pure geocoding only, no routing, distance matrix, map tiles, or rich place search
  • –Coverage and accuracy thin in developing regions where OpenStreetMap data is sparse
  • –Fixed subscription tiers rather than true granular pay-as-you-go billing
TomTom logoTomTom
  • +Proprietary real-time and historical traffic data sourced from billions of connected-vehicle/probe points, among the most accurate available
  • +Generous, no-credit-card free tier: 50,000 tile + 2,500 non-tile requests/day with commercial use allowed
  • +More permissive licensing than Google (can display results over non-TomTom basemaps; fewer caching restrictions)
  • –Low default rate limits on self-serve plans (commonly ~5 QPS for many endpoints) until raised under contract
  • –No official first-party Flutter SDK; developers must use third-party plugins
  • –Smaller developer community and fewer third-party tutorials/Stack Overflow answers than Google or Mapbox

OpenCage vs TomTom: questions

Which has better documentation, OpenCage or TomTom?
OpenCage scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 76 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, OpenCage or TomTom?
TomTom scores higher on reliability: 85 vs 65 out of 100.
Do OpenCage and TomTom have a free tier?
OpenCage: yes (2,500 req/day (free trial)). TomTom: yes (50k tile + 2.5k non-tile req/day).
How are OpenCage and TomTom priced?
OpenCage: Per day req tier (subscription). TomTom: Per 1k req (tile/non-tile).
Which has more official SDKs?
OpenCage lists 12 official SDKs, TomTom lists 5.

Other Maps & Geocoding comparisons