Head to head

Geoapify vs HERE

As a maps & geocoding API, HERE rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 81.5 to 72.4, a 9.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Geoapify logo
Geoapify
Geoapify
C
72.4ABI / 100

Affordable OSM-based geocoding & maps

HERE logo
HERE
HERE Technologies
B
81.5ABI / 100

Automotive & enterprise location data

Criterion by criterion

CriterionGeoapifyHERE
Documentation & DX
75
78
Reliability
68
90
Ecosystem & SDKs
58
80
Accessibility
92
78
APIbenchmarks Index72.481.5

Specifications

GeoapifyHERE
Best forAffordable OSM-based geocoding & mapsAutomotive & enterprise location data
Free tier3k credits/day (free plan)30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)
PricingPer credit (per req)Per 1k req / transactions
Official SDKs9 languages6 languages

Is Geoapify better than HERE?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, HERE rates higher (81.5 vs 72.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

HERE leads by 9.1 points (81.5 vs 72.4) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Geoapify wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionGeoapify logoGeoapifyHERE logoHEREWinner
Documentation & DX7578HERE logoHERE
Reliability6890HERE logoHERE
Ecosystem & SDKs5880HERE logoHERE
Accessibility9278Geoapify logoGeoapify
Geoapify vs HERE API comparison: ABI 72.4 vs 81.5; documentation & dx 75 vs 78, reliability 68 vs 90, ecosystem & sdks 58 vs 80, accessibility 92 vs 78.
Geoapify vs HERE API comparison: ABI 72.4 vs 81.5; documentation & dx 75 vs 78, reliability 68 vs 90, ecosystem & sdks 58 vs 80, accessibility 92 vs 78.

Choose Geoapify if… / choose HERE if…

Geoapify logoChoose Geoapify if
  • →accessibility matters most to you (92 vs 78)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (9 official SDKs vs 6)
  • →your use case matches its focus: affordable osm-based geocoding & maps
HERE logoChoose HERE if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (78 vs 75)
  • →reliability matters most to you (90 vs 68)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (80 vs 58)
  • →your use case matches its focus: automotive & enterprise location data

Pricing side by side

Geoapify logoGeoapify
Model
Per credit (per req)
Free tier
3k credits/day (free plan)
  • Free$0/mo
  • API 10$59/mo
  • API 25$109/mo
  • API 50$179/mo
  • API 100$299/mo
  • API 250 / Custom$609/mo; Custom from $860/mo
HERE logoHERE
Model
Per 1k req / transactions
Free tier
30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)
  • Freemium / Base$0/mo
  • Pay-as-you-grow$1 per 1,000 transactions
  • Pro$449/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Geoapify) and 2026-06-27 (HERE).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Geoapify · 9
JavaScript / TypeScript (Geocoder Autocomplete library)React (@geoapify component wrappers)Angular (component wrappers)Node.js (Route Planner SDK, code samples)Python (official code samples)Leaflet integrationMapLibre GL integrationOpenLayers integrationQGIS integration
Only HERE · 6
iOS (native)Android (native)Flutter (Explore Edition)Flutter (Navigate Edition)JavaScript (Maps API)REST API

Strengths and weaknesses

Geoapify logoGeoapify
  • +Cache-friendly licensing: OSM-based data may be stored/cached, unlike Google Maps which forbids it
  • +Unified, predictable credit pricing (1 geocoding request = 1 credit; map tiles = 0.25 credit) across all APIs
  • +Generous no-credit-card free tier (3,000 credits/day) usable for prototypes and light production
  • –OSM-backed accuracy can trail Google for rooftop precision and some addresses fail to resolve
  • –Lower tiers cap rate at 5-15 req/s, which can bottleneck very large dataset processing
  • –Modest 99.5% SLA and no prominent public real-time status page for transparent uptime reporting
HERE logoHERE
  • +Generous free tier: 250,000 transactions/month, roughly 25x Google Maps' free geocoding allowance
  • +Overage pricing (~$1 per 1,000) is far cheaper than Google's $5 per 1,000 at production volume
  • +Built on HERE's own automotive-grade map database (~400M addresses, ~120M places, 100+ countries), high accuracy
  • –Pricing model is complex and hard to forecast at scale, usage is product- and tier-specific
  • –Standard plans prohibit permanent storage/caching of geocoding results without a costly enterprise license
  • –Freemium rate limit of ~5 requests/second constrains high-concurrency real-time applications

Geoapify vs HERE: questions

Which has better documentation, Geoapify or HERE?
HERE scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 78 vs 75 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Geoapify or HERE?
HERE scores higher on reliability: 90 vs 68 out of 100.
Do Geoapify and HERE have a free tier?
Geoapify: yes (3k credits/day (free plan)). HERE: yes (30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)).
How are Geoapify and HERE priced?
Geoapify: Per credit (per req). HERE: Per 1k req / transactions.
Which has more official SDKs?
Geoapify lists 9 official SDKs, HERE lists 6.

Other Maps & Geocoding comparisons