Head to head
Lusha vs Prospeo
As a data enrichment API, Lusha rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 73.7 to 71.8, a 1.9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Lusha | Prospeo |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 73.7 | 71.8 |
Specifications
| Lusha | Prospeo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Contact reveal inside sales workflows | Verified email and mobile finding for outbound |
| Free tier | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) | 100 credits/mo, API access included |
| Pricing | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) | Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 4 languages |
Is Lusha better than Prospeo?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Lusha rates higher (73.7 vs 71.8). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Lusha leads by 1.9 points (73.7 vs 71.8) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Prospeo wins 2.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 76 | 78 | |
| Reliability | 78 | 66 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 68 | 62 | |
| Accessibility | 72 | 82 |
Choose Lusha if… / choose Prospeo if…
- →reliability matters most to you (78 vs 66)
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (68 vs 62)
- →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 4)
- →your use case matches its focus: contact reveal inside sales workflows
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (78 vs 76)
- →accessibility matters most to you (82 vs 72)
- →your use case matches its focus: verified email and mobile finding for outbound
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Per credit (email 1, phone 5)
- Free tier
- 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)
- Free$0/mo
- Starter$49.90/mo ($37.45/mo annual)
- Professional$69.90/mo ($52.45/mo annual)
- Premium$399.90/mo ($299.95/mo annual)
- Scale / customCustom
- Model
- Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 100 credits/mo, API access included
- Free$0
- StarterAbout $49/mo ($37/mo annual)
- GrowthAbout $99/mo ($74/mo annual)
- ProAbout $249/mo ($187/mo annual)
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Lusha) and 2026-10-07 (Prospeo).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 1
MCP server
Only Lusha · 4
REST API v3 (HTTPS/JSON)Native connectors: HubSpot, Salesforce, n8nBrowser extensionNo official language SDKs found
Only Prospeo · 3
REST APIComposio and workflow-tool integrationsNo official SDKs found
Strengths and weaknesses
- +API key on every plan including Free per official docs
- +Published per-plan rate limits and credit costs
- +Broad endpoint set: person, company, prospecting, signals, lookalike
- –Free and Starter plans capped at 100 API requests/day
- –No official language SDKs found
- –Phone reveals cost 5 credits and phone accuracy is a frequent complaint
- +Free API access stated in the docs
- +Plan-tiered published rate limits and per-endpoint credit costs
- +Search over 200M+ contacts and 30M+ companies with 30+ filters
- –Unused credits expire every billing cycle
- –Per-user pricing multiplies for teams
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits
Lusha vs Prospeo: questions
- Which has better documentation, Lusha or Prospeo?
- Prospeo scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 78 vs 76 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, Lusha or Prospeo?
- Lusha scores higher on reliability: 78 vs 66 out of 100.
- Do Lusha and Prospeo have a free tier?
- Lusha: yes (40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap)). Prospeo: yes (100 credits/mo, API access included).
- How are Lusha and Prospeo priced?
- Lusha: Per credit (email 1, phone 5). Prospeo: Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Lusha lists 5 official SDKs, Prospeo lists 4.