Head to head
FullEnrich vs Prospeo
As a data enrichment API, FullEnrich rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 72.5 to 71.8, a 0.7-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | FullEnrich | Prospeo |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 72.5 | 71.8 |
Specifications
| FullEnrich | Prospeo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Waterfall email and mobile enrichment | Verified email and mobile finding for outbound |
| Free tier | 50 free trial credits, no card | 100 credits/mo, API access included |
| Pricing | Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10) | Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 4 languages |
Is FullEnrich better than Prospeo?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, FullEnrich rates higher (72.5 vs 71.8). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
FullEnrich leads by 0.7 points (72.5 vs 71.8) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Prospeo wins 1.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 80 | 78 | |
| Reliability | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 64 | 62 | |
| Accessibility | 80 | 82 |
Choose FullEnrich if… / choose Prospeo if…
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 78)
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (64 vs 62)
- →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 4)
- →your use case matches its focus: waterfall email and mobile enrichment
- →accessibility matters most to you (82 vs 80)
- →your use case matches its focus: verified email and mobile finding for outbound
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 50 free trial credits, no card
- Free trial$0
- Starter / ProAbout $29-$55/mo (third-party figures)
- EnterpriseCustom
- Model
- Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 100 credits/mo, API access included
- Free$0
- StarterAbout $49/mo ($37/mo annual)
- GrowthAbout $99/mo ($74/mo annual)
- ProAbout $249/mo ($187/mo annual)
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (FullEnrich) and 2026-10-07 (Prospeo).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 3
REST API (v1, v2)MCP serverNo official SDKs found
Only FullEnrich · 2
OpenAPI specsZapier, Make, n8n, Clay, HubSpot integrations
Only Prospeo · 1
Composio and workflow-tool integrations
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
- +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
- +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
- –No official SDKs found
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
- –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth
- +Free API access stated in the docs
- +Plan-tiered published rate limits and per-endpoint credit costs
- +Search over 200M+ contacts and 30M+ companies with 30+ filters
- –Unused credits expire every billing cycle
- –Per-user pricing multiplies for teams
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits
FullEnrich vs Prospeo: questions
- Which has better documentation, FullEnrich or Prospeo?
- FullEnrich scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 78 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, FullEnrich or Prospeo?
- FullEnrich and Prospeo score the same on reliability (66).
- Do FullEnrich and Prospeo have a free tier?
- FullEnrich: yes (50 free trial credits, no card). Prospeo: yes (100 credits/mo, API access included).
- How are FullEnrich and Prospeo priced?
- FullEnrich: Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10). Prospeo: Per credit (email 0.5-1, mobile 10).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- FullEnrich lists 5 official SDKs, Prospeo lists 4.