Head to head

FullContact vs Seamless.AI

As a data enrichment API, FullContact rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 68.4 to 68.3, a 0.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

FullContact logo
FullContact
FullContact
C
68.4ABI / 100

Identity resolution / Identity Graph

Seamless.AI logo
Seamless.AI
Seamless.AI
C
68.3ABI / 100

Prospecting teams wanting UI plus API and MCP

Criterion by criterion

CriterionFullContactSeamless.AI
Documentation & DX
70
76
Reliability
70
74
Ecosystem & SDKs
62
68
Accessibility
72
50
APIbenchmarks Index68.468.3

Specifications

FullContactSeamless.AI
Best forIdentity resolution / Identity GraphProspecting teams wanting UI plus API and MCP
Free tier100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)Free plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)
PricingPer matched API callPer credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise
Official SDKs7 languages6 languages

Is FullContact better than Seamless.AI?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, FullContact rates higher (68.4 vs 68.3). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

FullContact leads by 0.1 points (68.4 vs 68.3) and wins 1 of 4 criteria; Seamless.AI wins 3.

Winner by criterion

CriterionFullContact logoFullContactSeamless.AI logoSeamless.AIWinner
Documentation & DX7076Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
Reliability7074Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
Ecosystem & SDKs6268Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
Accessibility7250FullContact logoFullContact
FullContact vs Seamless.AI API comparison: ABI 68.4 vs 68.3; documentation & dx 70 vs 76, reliability 70 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 68, accessibility 72 vs 50.
FullContact vs Seamless.AI API comparison: ABI 68.4 vs 68.3; documentation & dx 70 vs 76, reliability 70 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 62 vs 68, accessibility 72 vs 50.

Choose FullContact if… / choose Seamless.AI if…

FullContact logoChoose FullContact if
  • →accessibility matters most to you (72 vs 50)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (7 official SDKs vs 6)
  • →your use case matches its focus: identity resolution / identity graph
Seamless.AI logoChoose Seamless.AI if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (76 vs 70)
  • →reliability matters most to you (74 vs 70)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (68 vs 62)
  • →your use case matches its focus: prospecting teams wanting ui plus api and mcp

Pricing side by side

FullContact logoFullContact
Model
Per matched API call
Free tier
100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
  • Developer (Free)$0
  • Growth$99/month
  • Basic~$500/month
  • Premium~$2,000/month
  • Enterprise$10,000+/month (custom)
Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
Model
Per credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise
Free tier
Free plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)
  • Free$0
  • ProContact sales (third-party: about $4,740-$9,000/yr for 5 users)
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (FullContact) and 2026-10-07 (Seamless.AI).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
Postman collection
Only FullContact · 6
Go (official V3 client)Java 8 (official V3 client)Java 11+ (official V3 client)Python (official V3 client)Ruby (archived/legacy)PHP (archived/legacy)
Only Seamless.AI · 5
REST API (v1/v2)OpenAPI YAML/JSONMCP servercurl, Python and Node examplesNo official language SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

FullContact logoFullContact
  • +Multi-field enrichment: accepts many identifier types (email, phone, name+address, social URLs/usernames, MAIDs, plus Resolve PersonIDs) to lift match rates
  • +Deep attribute coverage, 900+ appendable data attributes via Person Insights Bundles (demographics, household, employment history, affinities, shopping habits)
  • +Tunable confidence: ML 'Belief Vector' lets callers set confidence thresholds per request to balance precision vs. match rate
  • –Real-world match rates often far below the advertised 93%, reviewers report ~40-50%, especially outside the U.S.
  • –Data-quality complaints of false positives in age, employment, and education fields, with no data-freshness timestamps on attributes
  • –Rate limit (~600 queries/min) too low for large batch enrichment jobs
Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
  • +Modern async API with webhooks or polling plus OpenAPI YAML/JSON specs
  • +MCP server with 57 tools documented for Claude, Cursor, VS Code and ChatGPT
  • +Published rate limits and simple credit rules (search 1 credit per 10 results; polling free)
  • –Plan eligibility for the API is unclear and sources conflict
  • –60 requests/min per endpoint, restrictive for bulk jobs
  • –Pro and Enterprise pricing is sales-led

FullContact vs Seamless.AI: questions

Which has better documentation, FullContact or Seamless.AI?
Seamless.AI scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 76 vs 70 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, FullContact or Seamless.AI?
Seamless.AI scores higher on reliability: 74 vs 70 out of 100.
Do FullContact and Seamless.AI have a free tier?
FullContact: yes (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)). Seamless.AI: yes (Free plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)).
How are FullContact and Seamless.AI priced?
FullContact: Per matched API call. Seamless.AI: Per credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise.
Which has more official SDKs?
FullContact lists 7 official SDKs, Seamless.AI lists 6.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons