Head to head

Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI

As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 68.3, a 11.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

Seamless.AI logo
Seamless.AI
Seamless.AI
C
68.3ABI / 100

Prospecting teams wanting UI plus API and MCP

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioSeamless.AI
Documentation & DX
80
76
Reliability
84
74
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
68
Accessibility
78
50
APIbenchmarks Index80.168.3

Specifications

Apollo.ioSeamless.AI
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentProspecting teams wanting UI plus API and MCP
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/moFree plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Per credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise
Official SDKs6 languages6 languages

Is Apollo.io better than Seamless.AI?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 68.3). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Apollo.io leads by 11.8 points (80.1 vs 68.3) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioSeamless.AI logoSeamless.AIWinner
Documentation & DX8076Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Reliability8474Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7868Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Accessibility7850Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 68.3; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 84 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 68, accessibility 78 vs 50.
Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 68.3; documentation & dx 80 vs 76, reliability 84 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 68, accessibility 78 vs 50.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose Seamless.AI if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 76)
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 74)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 68)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (78 vs 50)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
Seamless.AI logoChoose Seamless.AI if
  • →your use case matches its focus: prospecting teams wanting ui plus api and mcp

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
Model
Per credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise
Free tier
Free plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)
  • Free$0
  • ProContact sales (third-party: about $4,740-$9,000/yr for 5 users)
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-07 (Seamless.AI).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)
Only Apollo.io · 5
OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only Seamless.AI · 5
OpenAPI YAML/JSONPostman collectionMCP servercurl, Python and Node examplesNo official language SDKs found

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
Seamless.AI logoSeamless.AI
  • +Modern async API with webhooks or polling plus OpenAPI YAML/JSON specs
  • +MCP server with 57 tools documented for Claude, Cursor, VS Code and ChatGPT
  • +Published rate limits and simple credit rules (search 1 credit per 10 results; polling free)
  • –Plan eligibility for the API is unclear and sources conflict
  • –60 requests/min per endpoint, restrictive for bulk jobs
  • –Pro and Enterprise pricing is sales-led

Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or Seamless.AI?
Apollo.io scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 76 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or Seamless.AI?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 74 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and Seamless.AI have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). Seamless.AI: yes (Free plan (50 lifetime credits per third party; API eligibility unconfirmed)).
How are Apollo.io and Seamless.AI priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). Seamless.AI: Per credit; sales-led Pro/Enterprise.
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 6 official SDKs.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons