Head to head
Fiber vs Hunter
As a data enrichment API, Hunter rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 78.9 to 69.9, a 9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Fiber | Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 69.9 | 78.9 |
Specifications
| Fiber | Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines | Email finding and verification for outreach |
| Free tier | No | 50 credits/mo, API included |
| Pricing | Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans | Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification) |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 4 languages |
Is Fiber better than Hunter?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Hunter rates higher (78.9 vs 69.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Hunter leads by 9 points (78.9 vs 69.9) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Fiber wins 1.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 80 | 84 | |
| Reliability | 60 | 80 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 74 | 66 | |
| Accessibility | 62 | 86 |
Choose Fiber if… / choose Hunter if…
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (74 vs 66)
- →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 4)
- →your use case matches its focus: agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (84 vs 80)
- →reliability matters most to you (80 vs 60)
- →accessibility matters most to you (86 vs 62)
- →you want a free tier to start (50 credits/mo, API included)
- →your use case matches its focus: email finding and verification for outreach
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
- Free tier
- No
- Prospector$300/mo
- Growth$900/mo
- Enterprise$2,400/mo
- Bulk / datasetsFrom $1,000/mo (datasets)
- Trial$0 for 7 days
- Model
- Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification)
- Free tier
- 50 credits/mo, API included
- Free$0
- StarterEUR 34/mo discounted (EUR 49 regular)
- GrowthEUR 104/mo discounted (EUR 149 regular)
- ScaleEUR 209/mo discounted (EUR 299 regular)
- Data PlatformFrom EUR 6,500
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Fiber) and 2026-10-07 (Hunter).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 0
None
Only Fiber · 5
Node.js / TypeScript (@fiberai/sdk)Python (fiberai)REST API and OpenAPIMCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2, lite)First-party coding-agent plugin
Only Hunter · 4
REST API v2 (query, header or bearer key)OpenAPI JSONMCP serverCommunity libraries only (npm hunterio, Ruby gem)
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Official Node (@fiberai/sdk) and Python (fiberai) SDKs
- +Three MCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2 API key, lite) and a first-party plugin
- +Agent-native docs: per-operation markdown, llms.txt and openapi.json
- –No free tier; entry plan $300/month
- –Trial requirements conflict between homepage and pricing page
- –No confirmed official status page or SLA
- +API access included on the permanent Free plan
- +Published OpenAPI JSON and per-endpoint rate limits
- +Test API key for Domain Search, Email Finder and Email Verifier
- –No official SDKs found, community wrappers only
- –Narrow scope: strongest on work emails, weak on phones and non-public contacts
- –Free tier is only 50 credits/month
Fiber vs Hunter: questions
- Which has better documentation, Fiber or Hunter?
- Hunter scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 84 vs 80 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, Fiber or Hunter?
- Hunter scores higher on reliability: 80 vs 60 out of 100.
- Do Fiber and Hunter have a free tier?
- Fiber: no free tier. Hunter: yes (50 credits/mo, API included).
- How are Fiber and Hunter priced?
- Fiber: Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans. Hunter: Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification).
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Fiber lists 5 official SDKs, Hunter lists 4.