Head to head

Clay vs Fiber

As a data enrichment API, Fiber rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 69.9 to 66.9, a 3-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Clay logo
Clay
Clay
C
66.9ABI / 100

Multi-provider enrichment orchestration

Fiber logo
Fiber
Fiber
C
69.9ABI / 100

Agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines

Criterion by criterion

CriterionClayFiber
Documentation & DX
65
80
Reliability
75
60
Ecosystem & SDKs
60
74
Accessibility
68
62
APIbenchmarks Index66.969.9

Specifications

ClayFiber
Best forMulti-provider enrichment orchestrationAgent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines
Free tierFree plan with limited credits (no card)No
PricingData Credits + ActionsCredit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
Official SDKs1 languages5 languages

Is Clay better than Fiber?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Fiber rates higher (69.9 vs 66.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Fiber leads by 3 points (69.9 vs 66.9) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Clay wins 2.

Winner by criterion

CriterionClay logoClayFiber logoFiberWinner
Documentation & DX6580Fiber logoFiber
Reliability7560Clay logoClay
Ecosystem & SDKs6074Fiber logoFiber
Accessibility6862Clay logoClay
Clay vs Fiber API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 69.9; documentation & dx 65 vs 80, reliability 75 vs 60, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 74, accessibility 68 vs 62.
Clay vs Fiber API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 69.9; documentation & dx 65 vs 80, reliability 75 vs 60, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 74, accessibility 68 vs 62.

Choose Clay if… / choose Fiber if…

Clay logoChoose Clay if
  • →reliability matters most to you (75 vs 60)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (68 vs 62)
  • →you want a free tier to start (Free plan with limited credits (no card))
  • →your use case matches its focus: multi-provider enrichment orchestration
Fiber logoChoose Fiber if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 65)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (74 vs 60)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 1)
  • →your use case matches its focus: agent-native sales and recruiting data pipelines

Pricing side by side

Clay logoClay
Model
Data Credits + Actions
Free tier
Free plan with limited credits (no card)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Launchfrom ~$167–185/mo (annual)
  • Growthfrom ~$446–495/mo (annual)
  • EnterpriseCustom (annual commitment, ~$30k/yr+ typical)
Fiber logoFiber
Model
Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans
Free tier
No
  • Prospector$300/mo
  • Growth$900/mo
  • Enterprise$2,400/mo
  • Bulk / datasetsFrom $1,000/mo (datasets)
  • Trial$0 for 7 days

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Clay) and 2026-10-07 (Fiber).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Clay · 1
No official client SDK libraries published; integration is via HTTP API node, webhooks, and native CRM connectors
Only Fiber · 5
Node.js / TypeScript (@fiberai/sdk)Python (fiberai)REST API and OpenAPIMCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2, lite)First-party coding-agent plugin

Strengths and weaknesses

Clay logoClay
  • +Waterfall enrichment chains 150+ data providers under one subscription, materially raising email/firmographic match rates versus any single source
  • +Combines enrichment, AI web research (Claygent), and signal monitoring (funding, hiring, job changes, tech installs) in one platform
  • +Spreadsheet-style table UI plus Clay University make complex multi-step enrichment accessible without code
  • –Dual credit/action model causes fast, hard-to-predict credit burn; auto-recharge billing reportedly fires without advance warning
  • –Steep learning curve, reviewers cite hours in week one and 2–3 weeks before workflows are reliable
  • –Phone/mobile number coverage is weak (~30–35% match rate)
Fiber logoFiber
  • +Official Node (@fiberai/sdk) and Python (fiberai) SDKs
  • +Three MCP servers (v3 OAuth, v2 API key, lite) and a first-party plugin
  • +Agent-native docs: per-operation markdown, llms.txt and openapi.json
  • –No free tier; entry plan $300/month
  • –Trial requirements conflict between homepage and pricing page
  • –No confirmed official status page or SLA

Clay vs Fiber: questions

Which has better documentation, Clay or Fiber?
Fiber scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 65 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Clay or Fiber?
Clay scores higher on reliability: 75 vs 60 out of 100.
Do Clay and Fiber have a free tier?
Clay: yes (Free plan with limited credits (no card)). Fiber: no free tier.
How are Clay and Fiber priced?
Clay: Data Credits + Actions. Fiber: Credit-based ($0.02/credit) on monthly plans.
Which has more official SDKs?
Fiber lists 5 official SDKs, Clay lists 1.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons