Head to head

OpenWeather vs Visual Crossing

As a weather API, OpenWeather rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 84.6 to 76.4, a 8.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

OpenWeather logo
OpenWeather
OpenWeather
B
84.6ABI / 100

Ubiquitous developer weather API

Visual Crossing logo
Visual Crossing
Visual Crossing Corporation
B
76.4ABI / 100

Historical & timeline weather data

Criterion by criterion

CriterionOpenWeatherVisual Crossing
Documentation & DX
80
78
Reliability
82
74
Ecosystem & SDKs
90
66
Accessibility
88
90
APIbenchmarks Index84.676.4

Specifications

OpenWeatherVisual Crossing
Best forUbiquitous developer weather APIHistorical & timeline weather data
Free tier1M calls/mo (classic) + 1k One Call calls/day1,000 records/day
PricingPer call / freemium tiersPer record ($0.0001)
Official SDKs5 languages10 languages

Is OpenWeather better than Visual Crossing?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, OpenWeather rates higher (84.6 vs 76.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

OpenWeather leads by 8.2 points (84.6 vs 76.4) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Visual Crossing wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionOpenWeather logoOpenWeatherVisual Crossing logoVisual CrossingWinner
Documentation & DX8078OpenWeather logoOpenWeather
Reliability8274OpenWeather logoOpenWeather
Ecosystem & SDKs9066OpenWeather logoOpenWeather
Accessibility8890Visual Crossing logoVisual Crossing
OpenWeather vs Visual Crossing API comparison: ABI 84.6 vs 76.4; documentation & dx 80 vs 78, reliability 82 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 90 vs 66, accessibility 88 vs 90.
OpenWeather vs Visual Crossing API comparison: ABI 84.6 vs 76.4; documentation & dx 80 vs 78, reliability 82 vs 74, ecosystem & sdks 90 vs 66, accessibility 88 vs 90.

Choose OpenWeather if… / choose Visual Crossing if…

OpenWeather logoChoose OpenWeather if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 78)
  • →reliability matters most to you (82 vs 74)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (90 vs 66)
  • →your use case matches its focus: ubiquitous developer weather api
Visual Crossing logoChoose Visual Crossing if
  • →accessibility matters most to you (90 vs 88)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (10 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: historical & timeline weather data

Pricing side by side

OpenWeather logoOpenWeather
Model
Per call / freemium tiers
Free tier
1M calls/mo (classic) + 1k One Call calls/day
  • Free$0
  • One Call API 3.0 (pay as you call)1,000 calls/day free, then ~0.0012 GBP (~$0.0015) per call
  • Startup~$40/month
  • Developer~$180/month
  • Professional~$470/month
  • Enterprisefrom $3,000/month
Visual Crossing logoVisual Crossing
Model
Per record ($0.0001)
Free tier
1,000 records/day
  • Free$0
  • Metered (Pay-as-you-go)$0.0001 / record
  • Professional$35 / month
  • Corporate$150 / month
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (OpenWeather) and 2026-06-27 (Visual Crossing).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 2
Python (PyOWM, community)JavaScript / Node.js (community wrappers)
Only OpenWeather · 3
REST/JSON (HTTP, language-agnostic)Java / Android (OWM JAPIs, community)Curated community library list (awesome-openweather)
Only Visual Crossing · 8
JavaC# / .NETPHPRMATLABGoSwiftPerl

Strengths and weaknesses

OpenWeather logoOpenWeather
  • +Permanent free tier plus pay-as-you-call billing (1,000 free calls/day) makes it extremely cheap to start and prototype
  • +One Call API 3.0 consolidates current, minute, hourly (48h), daily (8d), alerts and 47-year history into one endpoint
  • +Hyperlocal ML model updated ~every 10 minutes; vendor cites <1% of temperature predictions deviating more than 5C
  • –Reported inconsistency between the Geocoding API and weather endpoints (duplicate/mismatched city results)
  • –Meaningful uptime (99.5%+) and faster data refresh are gated behind higher paid tiers; Startup targets only ~95%
  • –No prominent public real-time status/incident page for self-service customers
Visual Crossing logoVisual Crossing
  • +Single Timeline endpoint unifies geocoding, history, current, forecast, and climate stats in one call
  • +Transparent record-based pricing with a genuinely useful 1,000-records/day permanent free tier
  • +Deep historical archive (50+ years) interpolated to exact coordinates, ideal for ML training and analytics
  • –No public live status page or independently audited uptime history despite marketed 99.9% guarantee
  • –Forecast accuracy claims rely on vendor methodology, with no published third-party-verified error figures
  • –Thin presence on major review platforms (G2/Capterra/Trustpilot), making independent sentiment hard to gauge

OpenWeather vs Visual Crossing: questions

Which has better documentation, OpenWeather or Visual Crossing?
OpenWeather scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 78 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, OpenWeather or Visual Crossing?
OpenWeather scores higher on reliability: 82 vs 74 out of 100.
Do OpenWeather and Visual Crossing have a free tier?
OpenWeather: yes (1M calls/mo (classic) + 1k One Call calls/day). Visual Crossing: yes (1,000 records/day).
How are OpenWeather and Visual Crossing priced?
OpenWeather: Per call / freemium tiers. Visual Crossing: Per record ($0.0001).
Which has more official SDKs?
Visual Crossing lists 10 official SDKs, OpenWeather lists 5.

Other Weather comparisons