Head to head

AccuWeather vs Open-Meteo

As a weather API, Open-Meteo rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 79.3 to 72.5, a 6.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

AccuWeather logo
AccuWeather
AccuWeather
C
72.5ABI / 100

Brand-name meteorological data

Open-Meteo logo
Open-Meteo
Open-Meteo
B
79.3ABI / 100

Free open-source weather API

Criterion by criterion

CriterionAccuWeatherOpen-Meteo
Documentation & DX
72
82
Reliability
84
66
Ecosystem & SDKs
70
76
Accessibility
62
96
APIbenchmarks Index72.579.3

Specifications

AccuWeatherOpen-Meteo
Best forBrand-name meteorological dataFree open-source weather API
Free tier14-day trial, 500 req/day (Core)10k calls/day, no key (non-commercial)
PricingTiered packages (from $2-$25/mo)Free non-commercial / per-call commercial
Official SDKs7 languages7 languages

Is AccuWeather better than Open-Meteo?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Open-Meteo rates higher (79.3 vs 72.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Open-Meteo leads by 6.8 points (79.3 vs 72.5) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; AccuWeather wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionAccuWeather logoAccuWeatherOpen-Meteo logoOpen-MeteoWinner
Documentation & DX7282Open-Meteo logoOpen-Meteo
Reliability8466AccuWeather logoAccuWeather
Ecosystem & SDKs7076Open-Meteo logoOpen-Meteo
Accessibility6296Open-Meteo logoOpen-Meteo
AccuWeather vs Open-Meteo API comparison: ABI 72.5 vs 79.3; documentation & dx 72 vs 82, reliability 84 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 70 vs 76, accessibility 62 vs 96.
AccuWeather vs Open-Meteo API comparison: ABI 72.5 vs 79.3; documentation & dx 72 vs 82, reliability 84 vs 66, ecosystem & sdks 70 vs 76, accessibility 62 vs 96.

Choose AccuWeather if… / choose Open-Meteo if…

AccuWeather logoChoose AccuWeather if
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 66)
  • →your use case matches its focus: brand-name meteorological data
Open-Meteo logoChoose Open-Meteo if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (82 vs 72)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (76 vs 70)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (96 vs 62)
  • →your use case matches its focus: free open-source weather api

Pricing side by side

AccuWeather logoAccuWeather
Model
Tiered packages (from $2-$25/mo)
Free tier
14-day trial, 500 req/day (Core)
  • Free Trial$0 (14 days)
  • Starter$2/mo
  • Standard$25/mo
  • Prime$250/mo
  • Elite$500/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)
Open-Meteo logoOpen-Meteo
Model
Free non-commercial / per-call commercial
Free tier
10k calls/day, no key (non-commercial)
  • Free / Open-Access (non-commercial)$0
  • API Standard$29/mo
  • API Professional$99/mo
  • API EnterpriseCustom (contact info@open-meteo.com)

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (AccuWeather) and 2026-06-27 (Open-Meteo).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 2
Python (community: bieniu/accuweather, accuweather-client)Java
Only AccuWeather · 5
REST/HTTP (any language)JavaScript/Node.js (community examples, axios)PHPGoHome Assistant integration
Only Open-Meteo · 5
TypeScriptSwiftKotlinR (community)Dart (community)

Strengths and weaknesses

AccuWeather logoAccuWeather
  • +Independently validated accuracy, ForecastWatch studies (120M+ forecasts) repeatedly rank it #1 vs The Weather Channel, Weather Underground, Foreca, and Dark Sky
  • +Deep data catalog: RealFeel temperature, 70+ forecast parameters, MinuteCast minute-by-minute precipitation, government-sourced severe alerts, imagery/radar, and tropical data
  • +Long forecast horizons, up to 15 days self-serve and 90 days on enterprise
  • –Discontinued permanent free Core Weather API access in 2025, drawing developer backlash and forcing former free users onto paid plans
  • –Mandatory location-key workflow doubles call consumption, every forecast needs a prior Locations API lookup, and docs discourage hard-coding keys
  • –Markedly more expensive than OpenWeatherMap and other rivals for comparable volume
Open-Meteo logoOpen-Meteo
  • +No API key or account required for non-commercial use, a single HTTP GET returns JSON
  • +Blends 30+ models from 15+ national weather services and auto-selects the best local high-res model per coordinate
  • +Exceptionally broad data: forecast, historical (1940-present), marine, air quality, solar/PV, ensemble, seasonal, flood, climate
  • –Model data only, no real station observations, so no validated actuals or hyperlocal radar nowcasting
  • –Free tier rate limits (600/min, 5k/hr, 10k/day) frustrate some developers with bursty workloads
  • –Commercial use legally requires a paid plan even at low volumes

AccuWeather vs Open-Meteo: questions

Which has better documentation, AccuWeather or Open-Meteo?
Open-Meteo scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 82 vs 72 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, AccuWeather or Open-Meteo?
AccuWeather scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 66 out of 100.
Do AccuWeather and Open-Meteo have a free tier?
AccuWeather: yes (14-day trial, 500 req/day (Core)). Open-Meteo: yes (10k calls/day, no key (non-commercial)).
How are AccuWeather and Open-Meteo priced?
AccuWeather: Tiered packages (from $2-$25/mo). Open-Meteo: Free non-commercial / per-call commercial.
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 7 official SDKs.

Other Weather comparisons