Head to head

Google Maps Platform vs HERE

As a maps & geocoding API, Google Maps Platform rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 90.2 to 81.5, a 8.7-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

90.2ABI / 100

Enterprise-grade global maps & places

HERE logo
HERE
HERE Technologies
B
81.5ABI / 100

Automotive & enterprise location data

Criterion by criterion

CriterionGoogle Maps PlatformHERE
Documentation & DX
88
78
Reliability
96
90
Ecosystem & SDKs
95
80
Accessibility
80
78
APIbenchmarks Index90.281.5

Specifications

Google Maps PlatformHERE
Best forEnterprise-grade global maps & placesAutomotive & enterprise location data
Free tier10k free geocoding events/mo (Essentials SKUs)30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)
PricingPer 1k requests (per-SKU)Per 1k req / transactions
Official SDKs12 languages6 languages

Is Google Maps Platform better than HERE?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Google Maps Platform rates higher (90.2 vs 81.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Google Maps Platform leads by 8.7 points (90.2 vs 81.5) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionGoogle Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps PlatformHERE logoHEREWinner
Documentation & DX8878Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
Reliability9690Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
Ecosystem & SDKs9580Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
Accessibility8078Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
Google Maps Platform vs HERE API comparison: ABI 90.2 vs 81.5; documentation & dx 88 vs 78, reliability 96 vs 90, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 80, accessibility 80 vs 78.
Google Maps Platform vs HERE API comparison: ABI 90.2 vs 81.5; documentation & dx 88 vs 78, reliability 96 vs 90, ecosystem & sdks 95 vs 80, accessibility 80 vs 78.

Choose Google Maps Platform if… / choose HERE if…

Google Maps Platform logoChoose Google Maps Platform if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (88 vs 78)
  • →reliability matters most to you (96 vs 90)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (95 vs 80)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (80 vs 78)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (12 official SDKs vs 6)
  • →your use case matches its focus: enterprise-grade global maps & places
HERE logoChoose HERE if
  • →your use case matches its focus: automotive & enterprise location data

Pricing side by side

Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
Model
Per 1k requests (per-SKU)
Free tier
10k free geocoding events/mo (Essentials SKUs)
  • Pay-as-you-go (free tier)$0
  • Starter (subscription)$100/mo
  • Essentials (subscription)$275/mo
  • Pro (subscription)$1,200/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom
HERE logoHERE
Model
Per 1k req / transactions
Free tier
30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)
  • Freemium / Base$0/mo
  • Pay-as-you-grow$1 per 1,000 transactions
  • Pro$449/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Google Maps Platform) and 2026-06-27 (HERE).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
Flutter (google_maps_flutter)
Only Google Maps Platform · 11
Maps JavaScript API (web)Maps SDK for Android (Kotlin/Java)Maps SDK for iOS (Swift/Objective-C)Places SDK for AndroidPlaces SDK for iOSNavigation SDK (Android/iOS)Python client libraryJava client libraryGo client libraryNode.js client libraryReact (@react-google-maps/api / community wrappers)
Only HERE · 4
iOS (native)Android (native)JavaScript (Maps API)REST API

Strengths and weaknesses

Google Maps Platform logoGoogle Maps Platform
  • +World's most comprehensive and accurate global map, POI database, and live traffic data, the benchmark other geocoders are compared against
  • +Single vendor covering geocoding, autocomplete, routing, distance matrix, static/dynamic maps, Street View, and environment APIs
  • +Excellent, widely-praised documentation and mature official SDKs for web, Android, iOS, and server
  • –Expensive at high request volumes compared to Mapbox, HERE, and MapTiler
  • –Pricing structure is complex and bills can spike unpredictably; the March 2025 removal of the $200 universal credit frustrated many existing users
  • –Restrictive licensing: results generally cannot be stored/cached and must be displayed on a Google map, limiting standalone geocoding use
HERE logoHERE
  • +Generous free tier: 250,000 transactions/month, roughly 25x Google Maps' free geocoding allowance
  • +Overage pricing (~$1 per 1,000) is far cheaper than Google's $5 per 1,000 at production volume
  • +Built on HERE's own automotive-grade map database (~400M addresses, ~120M places, 100+ countries), high accuracy
  • –Pricing model is complex and hard to forecast at scale, usage is product- and tier-specific
  • –Standard plans prohibit permanent storage/caching of geocoding results without a costly enterprise license
  • –Freemium rate limit of ~5 requests/second constrains high-concurrency real-time applications

Google Maps Platform vs HERE: questions

Which has better documentation, Google Maps Platform or HERE?
Google Maps Platform scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 88 vs 78 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Google Maps Platform or HERE?
Google Maps Platform scores higher on reliability: 96 vs 90 out of 100.
Do Google Maps Platform and HERE have a free tier?
Google Maps Platform: yes (10k free geocoding events/mo (Essentials SKUs)). HERE: yes (30k req/mo (Base Plan, card required)).
How are Google Maps Platform and HERE priced?
Google Maps Platform: Per 1k requests (per-SKU). HERE: Per 1k req / transactions.
Which has more official SDKs?
Google Maps Platform lists 12 official SDKs, HERE lists 6.

Other Maps & Geocoding comparisons