Head to head

ConfigCat vs Split

As a feature flag API, ConfigCat rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 83.2 to 81.1, a 2.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

ConfigCat logo
ConfigCat
ConfigCat
B
83.2ABI / 100

Simple flat-priced feature flags for any team size

Split logo
Split
Harness
B
81.1ABI / 100

Feature management + experimentation (Harness FME)

Criterion by criterion

CriterionConfigCatSplit
Documentation & DX
84
80
Reliability
78
84
Ecosystem & SDKs
82
82
Accessibility
90
78
APIbenchmarks Index83.281.1

Specifications

ConfigCatSplit
Best forSimple flat-priced feature flags for any team sizeFeature management + experimentation (Harness FME)
Free tierFree: 10 flags, unlimited seats, unlimited flag readsFree Developer tier: up to 10 seats, 50 feature flags
PricingFlat tier (config fetches)Per-seat (usage-based at scale)
Official SDKs12 languages12 languages

Is ConfigCat better than Split?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, ConfigCat rates higher (83.2 vs 81.1). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

ConfigCat leads by 2.1 points (83.2 vs 81.1) and wins 2 of 4 criteria; Split wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionConfigCat logoConfigCatSplit logoSplitWinner
Documentation & DX8480ConfigCat logoConfigCat
Reliability7884Split logoSplit
Ecosystem & SDKs8282Tie
Accessibility9078ConfigCat logoConfigCat
ConfigCat vs Split API comparison: ABI 83.2 vs 81.1; documentation & dx 84 vs 80, reliability 78 vs 84, ecosystem & sdks 82 vs 82, accessibility 90 vs 78.
ConfigCat vs Split API comparison: ABI 83.2 vs 81.1; documentation & dx 84 vs 80, reliability 78 vs 84, ecosystem & sdks 82 vs 82, accessibility 90 vs 78.

Choose ConfigCat if… / choose Split if…

ConfigCat logoChoose ConfigCat if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (84 vs 80)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (90 vs 78)
  • →your use case matches its focus: simple flat-priced feature flags for any team size
Split logoChoose Split if
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 78)
  • →your use case matches its focus: feature management + experimentation (harness fme)

Pricing side by side

ConfigCat logoConfigCat
Model
Flat tier (config fetches)
Free tier
Free: 10 flags, unlimited seats, unlimited flag reads
  • Forever Free$0/mo
  • Pro$110/mo
  • Smart$325/mo
  • Enterprise$900/mo
  • Dedicated$4,500/mo
Split logoSplit
Model
Per-seat (usage-based at scale)
Free tier
Free Developer tier: up to 10 seats, 50 feature flags
  • Free / Developer$0
  • Team (Starter)from $33 / seat / month
  • Business / GrowthCustom (contact sales)
  • EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (ConfigCat) and 2026-06-27 (Split).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 4
JavaScript (Browser/Node/Deno/Bun)GoPythonPHP
Only ConfigCat · 8
.NETReactCloudflare WorkerJava / AndroidKotlin MultiplatformRuby / Rust / Elixir / C++Swift (iOS) / Dart (Flutter)Unity / Unreal Engine
Only Split · 8
Java.NET / C#RubyAndroidiOSFlutterReact / React NativeAngular & Redux utilities

Strengths and weaknesses

ConfigCat logoConfigCat
  • +Flat pricing with unlimited team members, MAUs/contexts and flag reads on every tier (including Free), no per-seat or per-MAU charges
  • +Genuinely simple to adopt; many teams self-serve in hours without sales contact
  • +Generous Forever Free plan with unlimited seats
  • –No built-in experimentation/A-B test result analytics, intentionally not an experimentation platform
  • –Segment and target-user management can become messy as flag count grows
  • –UI has a learning curve for newcomers
Split logoSplit
  • +Experimentation is first-class: rolling out a flag automatically attributes it to business/operational metrics with statistical significance testing
  • +Local, in-memory SDK evaluation backed by Fastly CDN + streaming means sub-millisecond treatment evaluation and millisecond flag propagation
  • +Strong, granular customer segmentation/targeting ("splits") on user attributes
  • –Premium pricing, generally more expensive than LaunchDarkly, with metered "traffic keys"/MTUs that make scaling costs hard to predict
  • –Pricing is opaque: Growth/Enterprise require contacting sales, and most advanced features (data export, SSO, audit logs) are gated to Enterprise
  • –Weaker native CI/CD pipeline integration than competitors; some connections need custom webhooks or Zapier

ConfigCat vs Split: questions

Which has better documentation, ConfigCat or Split?
ConfigCat scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 84 vs 80 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, ConfigCat or Split?
Split scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 78 out of 100.
Do ConfigCat and Split have a free tier?
ConfigCat: yes (Free: 10 flags, unlimited seats, unlimited flag reads). Split: yes (Free Developer tier: up to 10 seats, 50 feature flags).
How are ConfigCat and Split priced?
ConfigCat: Flat tier (config fetches). Split: Per-seat (usage-based at scale).
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 12 official SDKs.

Other Feature Flag comparisons