Head to head

Explorium vs FullContact

As a data enrichment API, Explorium rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 77.4 to 68.4, a 9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Explorium logo
Explorium
Explorium
B
77.4ABI / 100

Agent-driven company and prospect enrichment

FullContact logo
FullContact
FullContact
C
68.4ABI / 100

Identity resolution / Identity Graph

Criterion by criterion

CriterionExploriumFullContact
Documentation & DX
82
70
Reliability
70
70
Ecosystem & SDKs
74
62
Accessibility
84
72
APIbenchmarks Index77.468.4

Specifications

ExploriumFullContact
Best forAgent-driven company and prospect enrichmentIdentity resolution / Identity Graph
Free tier100 free credits, valid 90 days (not recurring)100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
PricingPrepaid credit packagesPer matched API call
Official SDKs7 languages7 languages

Is Explorium better than FullContact?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Explorium rates higher (77.4 vs 68.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Explorium leads by 9 points (77.4 vs 68.4) and wins 3 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionExplorium logoExploriumFullContact logoFullContactWinner
Documentation & DX8270Explorium logoExplorium
Reliability7070Tie
Ecosystem & SDKs7462Explorium logoExplorium
Accessibility8472Explorium logoExplorium
Explorium vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 77.4 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 82 vs 70, reliability 70 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 74 vs 62, accessibility 84 vs 72.
Explorium vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 77.4 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 82 vs 70, reliability 70 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 74 vs 62, accessibility 84 vs 72.

Choose Explorium if… / choose FullContact if…

Explorium logoChoose Explorium if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (82 vs 70)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (74 vs 62)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (84 vs 72)
  • →your use case matches its focus: agent-driven company and prospect enrichment
FullContact logoChoose FullContact if
  • →your use case matches its focus: identity resolution / identity graph

Pricing side by side

Explorium logoExplorium
Model
Prepaid credit packages
Free tier
100 free credits, valid 90 days (not recurring)
  • Free trial$0
  • Lite$29.99
  • Starter$149.99
  • Growth$749.99
  • Scale$7,499.99
  • EnterpriseCustom
FullContact logoFullContact
Model
Per matched API call
Free tier
100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
  • Developer (Free)$0
  • Growth$99/month
  • Basic~$500/month
  • Premium~$2,000/month
  • Enterprise$10,000+/month (custom)

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Explorium) and 2026-06-27 (FullContact).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Explorium · 7
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)OpenAPI specification (/openapi.json)AgentSource MCP server (remote, Bearer auth)explorium-mcp-server (Python, pip)Python MCP SDK, LangGraph and OpenAI implementation guidesllms.txt documentation indexNo first-party REST language SDKs
Only FullContact · 7
Go (official V3 client)Java 8 (official V3 client)Java 11+ (official V3 client)Python (official V3 client)Ruby (archived/legacy)PHP (archived/legacy)Postman collection

Strengths and weaknesses

Explorium logoExplorium
  • +Self-serve free account and public prepaid packages from $29.99, no sales call needed
  • +OpenAPI spec and llms.txt published alongside the API reference
  • +Documented rate limit (200 queries/min) with X-RateLimit-* headers and Retry-After
  • –No public status page or independent uptime history found; 99.999% uptime is a vendor claim
  • –No first-party REST language SDKs; Python path uses the generic MCP SDK
  • –Free credits are a one-time 100-credit, 90-day grant
FullContact logoFullContact
  • +Multi-field enrichment: accepts many identifier types (email, phone, name+address, social URLs/usernames, MAIDs, plus Resolve PersonIDs) to lift match rates
  • +Deep attribute coverage, 900+ appendable data attributes via Person Insights Bundles (demographics, household, employment history, affinities, shopping habits)
  • +Tunable confidence: ML 'Belief Vector' lets callers set confidence thresholds per request to balance precision vs. match rate
  • –Real-world match rates often far below the advertised 93%, reviewers report ~40-50%, especially outside the U.S.
  • –Data-quality complaints of false positives in age, employment, and education fields, with no data-freshness timestamps on attributes
  • –Rate limit (~600 queries/min) too low for large batch enrichment jobs

Explorium vs FullContact: questions

Which has better documentation, Explorium or FullContact?
Explorium scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 82 vs 70 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Explorium or FullContact?
Explorium and FullContact score the same on reliability (70).
Do Explorium and FullContact have a free tier?
Explorium: yes (100 free credits, valid 90 days (not recurring)). FullContact: yes (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)).
How are Explorium and FullContact priced?
Explorium: Prepaid credit packages. FullContact: Per matched API call.
Which has more official SDKs?
Both list 7 official SDKs.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons