Head to head

Coresignal vs FullContact

As a data enrichment API, Coresignal rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 75.2 to 68.4, a 6.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Coresignal logo
Coresignal
Coresignal
B
75.2ABI / 100

Raw professional and jobs data for engineering teams

FullContact logo
FullContact
FullContact
C
68.4ABI / 100

Identity resolution / Identity Graph

Criterion by criterion

CriterionCoresignalFullContact
Documentation & DX
80
70
Reliability
78
70
Ecosystem & SDKs
66
62
Accessibility
76
72
APIbenchmarks Index75.268.4

Specifications

CoresignalFullContact
Best forRaw professional and jobs data for engineering teamsIdentity resolution / Identity Graph
Free tierNo100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
PricingMonthly credit subscription (Collect + Search credits)Per matched API call
Official SDKs5 languages7 languages

Is Coresignal better than FullContact?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Coresignal rates higher (75.2 vs 68.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Coresignal leads by 6.8 points (75.2 vs 68.4) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionCoresignal logoCoresignalFullContact logoFullContactWinner
Documentation & DX8070Coresignal logoCoresignal
Reliability7870Coresignal logoCoresignal
Ecosystem & SDKs6662Coresignal logoCoresignal
Accessibility7672Coresignal logoCoresignal
Coresignal vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 75.2 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 80 vs 70, reliability 78 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 66 vs 62, accessibility 76 vs 72.
Coresignal vs FullContact API comparison: ABI 75.2 vs 68.4; documentation & dx 80 vs 70, reliability 78 vs 70, ecosystem & sdks 66 vs 62, accessibility 76 vs 72.

Choose Coresignal if… / choose FullContact if…

Coresignal logoChoose Coresignal if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 70)
  • →reliability matters most to you (78 vs 70)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (66 vs 62)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (76 vs 72)
  • →your use case matches its focus: raw professional and jobs data for engineering teams
FullContact logoChoose FullContact if
  • →you want a free tier to start (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan))
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (7 official SDKs vs 5)
  • →your use case matches its focus: identity resolution / identity graph

Pricing side by side

Coresignal logoCoresignal
Model
Monthly credit subscription (Collect + Search credits)
Free tier
No
  • Free trial$0
  • Mini$49/mo
  • Starter$199/mo
  • Pro$499/mo
  • Growth to Elite$1,000 to $5,000/mo
  • DatasetsFrom $1,000+
FullContact logoFullContact
Model
Per matched API call
Free tier
100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)
  • Developer (Free)$0
  • Growth$99/month
  • Basic~$500/month
  • Premium~$2,000/month
  • Enterprise$10,000+/month (custom)

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-10-07 (Coresignal) and 2026-06-27 (FullContact).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Coresignal · 5
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)Coresignal MCP server (Node.js via mcp-remote)API playgrounds (web)llms.txt / llms-full.txt documentation exportsNo official language SDKs found
Only FullContact · 7
Go (official V3 client)Java 8 (official V3 client)Java 11+ (official V3 client)Python (official V3 client)Ruby (archived/legacy)PHP (archived/legacy)Postman collection

Strengths and weaknesses

Coresignal logoCoresignal
  • +Transparent self-serve credit plans from $49/month, no sales call to start
  • +Quickstart, API playgrounds, rate-limit reference and llms.txt/llms-full.txt exports in the docs
  • +Official MCP server for Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients
  • –No official language SDKs, OpenAPI spec page or Postman collection found in the docs index
  • –Free access is a 7-day trial only, not a recurring free tier
  • –Company data refreshes roughly monthly per third-party reviews; no direct-dial phone numbers
FullContact logoFullContact
  • +Multi-field enrichment: accepts many identifier types (email, phone, name+address, social URLs/usernames, MAIDs, plus Resolve PersonIDs) to lift match rates
  • +Deep attribute coverage, 900+ appendable data attributes via Person Insights Bundles (demographics, household, employment history, affinities, shopping habits)
  • +Tunable confidence: ML 'Belief Vector' lets callers set confidence thresholds per request to balance precision vs. match rate
  • –Real-world match rates often far below the advertised 93%, reviewers report ~40-50%, especially outside the U.S.
  • –Data-quality complaints of false positives in age, employment, and education fields, with no data-freshness timestamps on attributes
  • –Rate limit (~600 queries/min) too low for large batch enrichment jobs

Coresignal vs FullContact: questions

Which has better documentation, Coresignal or FullContact?
Coresignal scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 70 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Coresignal or FullContact?
Coresignal scores higher on reliability: 78 vs 70 out of 100.
Do Coresignal and FullContact have a free tier?
Coresignal: no free tier. FullContact: yes (100 API calls/mo (Developer plan)).
How are Coresignal and FullContact priced?
Coresignal: Monthly credit subscription (Collect + Search credits). FullContact: Per matched API call.
Which has more official SDKs?
FullContact lists 7 official SDKs, Coresignal lists 5.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons