Head to head

Clay vs ContactOut

As a data enrichment API, Clay rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 66.9 to 55, a 11.9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Clay logo
Clay
Clay
C
66.9ABI / 100

Multi-provider enrichment orchestration

ContactOut logo
ContactOut
ContactOut
D
55.0ABI / 100

LinkedIn-based email and phone lookup for recruiters and sales

Criterion by criterion

CriterionClayContactOut
Documentation & DX
65
70
Reliability
75
58
Ecosystem & SDKs
60
50
Accessibility
68
35
APIbenchmarks Index66.955.0

Specifications

ClayContactOut
Best forMulti-provider enrichment orchestrationLinkedIn-based email and phone lookup for recruiters and sales
Free tierFree plan with limited credits (no card)5 emails, 5 phones, 5 exports/day in the app; API not included
PricingData Credits + ActionsCredits (search, email, phone) on a quoted API plan
Official SDKs1 languages4 languages

Is Clay better than ContactOut?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Clay rates higher (66.9 vs 55). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Clay leads by 11.9 points (66.9 vs 55) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; ContactOut wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionClay logoClayContactOut logoContactOutWinner
Documentation & DX6570ContactOut logoContactOut
Reliability7558Clay logoClay
Ecosystem & SDKs6050Clay logoClay
Accessibility6835Clay logoClay
Clay vs ContactOut API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 55; documentation & dx 65 vs 70, reliability 75 vs 58, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 50, accessibility 68 vs 35.
Clay vs ContactOut API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 55; documentation & dx 65 vs 70, reliability 75 vs 58, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 50, accessibility 68 vs 35.

Choose Clay if… / choose ContactOut if…

Clay logoChoose Clay if
  • →reliability matters most to you (75 vs 58)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (60 vs 50)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (68 vs 35)
  • →your use case matches its focus: multi-provider enrichment orchestration
ContactOut logoChoose ContactOut if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (70 vs 65)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (4 official SDKs vs 1)
  • →your use case matches its focus: linkedin-based email and phone lookup for recruiters and sales

Pricing side by side

Clay logoClay
Model
Data Credits + Actions
Free tier
Free plan with limited credits (no card)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Launchfrom ~$167–185/mo (annual)
  • Growthfrom ~$446–495/mo (annual)
  • EnterpriseCustom (annual commitment, ~$30k/yr+ typical)
ContactOut logoContactOut
Model
Credits (search, email, phone) on a quoted API plan
Free tier
5 emails, 5 phones, 5 exports/day in the app; API not included
  • Free$0
  • Email~$49-$99/mo (sources conflict)
  • Email + Phone~$99-$199/mo (sources conflict)
  • Team / APICustom quote

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Clay) and 2026-10-07 (ContactOut).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Clay · 1
No official client SDK libraries published; integration is via HTTP API node, webhooks, and native CRM connectors
Only ContactOut · 4
REST API (token header auth)Webhooks for async bulk v2Third-party MCP via Composio and viaSocketNo official SDKs or OpenAPI spec found

Strengths and weaknesses

Clay logoClay
  • +Waterfall enrichment chains 150+ data providers under one subscription, materially raising email/firmographic match rates versus any single source
  • +Combines enrichment, AI web research (Claygent), and signal monitoring (funding, hiring, job changes, tech installs) in one platform
  • +Spreadsheet-style table UI plus Clay University make complex multi-step enrichment accessible without code
  • –Dual credit/action model causes fast, hard-to-predict credit burn; auto-recharge billing reportedly fires without advance warning
  • –Steep learning curve, reviewers cite hours in week one and 2–3 weeks before workflows are reliable
  • –Phone/mobile number coverage is weak (~30–35% match rate)
ContactOut logoContactOut
  • +Public API reference with auth, endpoint credit rules and per-endpoint rate limits
  • +Bulk enrichment up to 1,000 profiles per v2 job with webhook delivery
  • +Boolean search, decision-maker and company endpoints plus email and phone verification
  • –API is not on self-serve plans; Team/API requires a custom quote
  • –Free app plan (5/5/5 per day) does not include API access
  • –962 outages tracked by StatusGator over the past year, with a minor outage on the verification date

Clay vs ContactOut: questions

Which has better documentation, Clay or ContactOut?
ContactOut scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 70 vs 65 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Clay or ContactOut?
Clay scores higher on reliability: 75 vs 58 out of 100.
Do Clay and ContactOut have a free tier?
Clay: yes (Free plan with limited credits (no card)). ContactOut: yes (5 emails, 5 phones, 5 exports/day in the app; API not included).
How are Clay and ContactOut priced?
Clay: Data Credits + Actions. ContactOut: Credits (search, email, phone) on a quoted API plan.
Which has more official SDKs?
ContactOut lists 4 official SDKs, Clay lists 1.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons