Head to head

Clay vs Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence)

As a data enrichment API, Clay rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 66.9 to 59.6, a 7.3-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Clay logo
Clay
Clay
C
66.9ABI / 100

Multi-provider enrichment orchestration

59.6ABI / 100

CRM-native enrichment in HubSpot

Criterion by criterion

CriterionClayClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)
Documentation & DX
65
58
Reliability
75
80
Ecosystem & SDKs
60
55
Accessibility
68
42
APIbenchmarks Index66.959.6

Specifications

ClayClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)
Best forMulti-provider enrichment orchestrationCRM-native enrichment in HubSpot
Free tierFree plan with limited credits (no card)No
PricingData Credits + ActionsHubSpot plan + credit packs
Official SDKs1 languages4 languages

Is Clay better than Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence)?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Clay rates higher (66.9 vs 59.6). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Clay leads by 7.3 points (66.9 vs 59.6) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionClay logoClayClearbit (Breeze Intelligence) logoClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)Winner
Documentation & DX6558Clay logoClay
Reliability7580Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) logoClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)
Ecosystem & SDKs6055Clay logoClay
Accessibility6842Clay logoClay
Clay vs Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 59.6; documentation & dx 65 vs 58, reliability 75 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 55, accessibility 68 vs 42.
Clay vs Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) API comparison: ABI 66.9 vs 59.6; documentation & dx 65 vs 58, reliability 75 vs 80, ecosystem & sdks 60 vs 55, accessibility 68 vs 42.

Choose Clay if… / choose Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) if…

Clay logoChoose Clay if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (65 vs 58)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (60 vs 55)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (68 vs 42)
  • →you want a free tier to start (Free plan with limited credits (no card))
  • →your use case matches its focus: multi-provider enrichment orchestration
Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) logoChoose Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) if
  • →reliability matters most to you (80 vs 75)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (4 official SDKs vs 1)
  • →your use case matches its focus: crm-native enrichment in hubspot

Pricing side by side

Clay logoClay
Model
Data Credits + Actions
Free tier
Free plan with limited credits (no card)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Launchfrom ~$167–185/mo (annual)
  • Growthfrom ~$446–495/mo (annual)
  • EnterpriseCustom (annual commitment, ~$30k/yr+ typical)
Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) logoClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)
Model
HubSpot plan + credit packs
Free tier
No
  • Breeze Intelligence credit pack (entry)$45/mo (annual) / $50/mo (monthly)
  • 1,000-credit pack~$450/mo (est.)
  • 10,000-credit pack~$4,500/mo (est.)
  • HubSpot Starter (required platform)from $15/mo
  • HubSpot Professional (required platform)~$1,170/mo
  • HubSpot Enterprise (required platform)~$4,135/mo

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Clay) and 2026-06-27 (Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence)).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Clay · 1
No official client SDK libraries published; integration is via HTTP API node, webhooks, and native CRM connectors
Only Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) · 4
Ruby (clearbit-ruby gem, unmaintained)Node.js (clearbit-node, unmaintained)Python (clearbit-python, unmaintained)REST / HTTP API (HTTP Basic auth)

Strengths and weaknesses

Clay logoClay
  • +Waterfall enrichment chains 150+ data providers under one subscription, materially raising email/firmographic match rates versus any single source
  • +Combines enrichment, AI web research (Claygent), and signal monitoring (funding, hiring, job changes, tech installs) in one platform
  • +Spreadsheet-style table UI plus Clay University make complex multi-step enrichment accessible without code
  • –Dual credit/action model causes fast, hard-to-predict credit burn; auto-recharge billing reportedly fires without advance warning
  • –Steep learning curve, reviewers cite hours in week one and 2–3 weeks before workflows are reliable
  • –Phone/mobile number coverage is weak (~30–35% match rate)
Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) logoClearbit (Breeze Intelligence)
  • +Strong, well-regarded firmographic accuracy (80-90% per G2) for US companies with 50+ employees
  • +100+ firmographic and technographic attributes across ~50M+ companies
  • +Native, deeply integrated enrichment inside HubSpot CRM with auto-fill on records
  • –No longer available as a standalone product, requires a paid HubSpot subscription, with no new API keys for accounts created in 2024+
  • –Standalone Enrichment, Logo, and Prospector APIs deprecated; no first-party integration for Salesforce, Pipedrive, or non-HubSpot CRMs (lock-in)
  • –Weak coverage for SMBs under 50 employees and companies outside North America / Western Europe

Clay vs Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence): questions

Which has better documentation, Clay or Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence)?
Clay scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 65 vs 58 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Clay or Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence)?
Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) scores higher on reliability: 80 vs 75 out of 100.
Do Clay and Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) have a free tier?
Clay: yes (Free plan with limited credits (no card)). Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence): no free tier.
How are Clay and Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) priced?
Clay: Data Credits + Actions. Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence): HubSpot plan + credit packs.
Which has more official SDKs?
Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence) lists 4 official SDKs, Clay lists 1.

Other Data Enrichment comparisons