Head to head

Frontegg vs WorkOS

As a authentication & identity API, WorkOS rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 86.5 to 76.6, a 9.9-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Frontegg logo
Frontegg
Frontegg
B
76.6ABI / 100

Multi-tenant B2B user management

WorkOS logo
WorkOS
WorkOS
A
86.5ABI / 100

Enterprise SSO & SCIM for B2B

Criterion by criterion

CriterionFronteggWorkOS
Documentation & DX
78
90
Reliability
75
84
Ecosystem & SDKs
72
82
Accessibility
82
90
APIbenchmarks Index76.686.5

Specifications

FronteggWorkOS
Best forMulti-tenant B2B user managementEnterprise SSO & SCIM for B2B
Free tier7.5k MAU (free tier)Up to 1M MAU on AuthKit; $125/connection for SSO/SCIM
PricingMAU-based (+ feature add-ons)Per connection / MAU-based
Official SDKs10 languages12 languages

Is Frontegg better than WorkOS?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, WorkOS rates higher (86.5 vs 76.6). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

WorkOS leads by 9.9 points (86.5 vs 76.6) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionFrontegg logoFronteggWorkOS logoWorkOSWinner
Documentation & DX7890WorkOS logoWorkOS
Reliability7584WorkOS logoWorkOS
Ecosystem & SDKs7282WorkOS logoWorkOS
Accessibility8290WorkOS logoWorkOS
Frontegg vs WorkOS API comparison: ABI 76.6 vs 86.5; documentation & dx 78 vs 90, reliability 75 vs 84, ecosystem & sdks 72 vs 82, accessibility 82 vs 90.
Frontegg vs WorkOS API comparison: ABI 76.6 vs 86.5; documentation & dx 78 vs 90, reliability 75 vs 84, ecosystem & sdks 72 vs 82, accessibility 82 vs 90.

Choose Frontegg if… / choose WorkOS if…

Frontegg logoChoose Frontegg if
  • →your use case matches its focus: multi-tenant b2b user management
WorkOS logoChoose WorkOS if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (90 vs 78)
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 75)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (82 vs 72)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (90 vs 82)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (12 official SDKs vs 10)
  • →your use case matches its focus: enterprise sso & scim for b2b

Pricing side by side

Frontegg logoFrontegg
Model
MAU-based (+ feature add-ons)
Free tier
7.5k MAU (free tier)
  • Pay as You Go (PAYG)$0/mo to start, usage-based
  • EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)
WorkOS logoWorkOS
Model
Per connection / MAU-based
Free tier
Up to 1M MAU on AuthKit; $125/connection for SSO/SCIM
  • Pay as You GoUsage-based
  • Annual Credits (Enterprise)Custom
  • AuthKit (User Management)Free up to 1M MAUs, then $2,500/mo per additional 1M MAUs
  • Single Sign-On / Directory Sync$125 per connection/mo (volume discounts to $50 at 101–200)
  • Audit Logs$125/mo per SIEM stream + $99/mo per 1M events retained
  • Radar (Bot & Fraud Protection) / Custom DomainRadar: free first 1k checks then $100/50k; Custom Domain $99/mo

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Frontegg) and 2026-06-27 (WorkOS).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
Python
Only Frontegg · 9
ReactAngularVueNext.jsNode.js / JavaScriptAndroidiOSREST APIWebhooks
Only WorkOS · 11
Node.jsRubyPHPPHP (Laravel)GoJavaKotlin.NETElixirAuthKit for React / Next.js / Remix / React RouterJavaScript (AuthKit)

Strengths and weaknesses

Frontegg logoFrontegg
  • +Multi-tenancy is a first-class primitive: per-tenant users, roles, SSO, branding and policies out of the box
  • +Fast time-to-value; reviewers call it plug-and-play with hosted login live in hours
  • +Entitlements engine ties feature-gating to subscription plans, well-suited to SaaS monetization
  • –Limited customization of the hosted/embedded login UI for teams with strict branding needs
  • –Cannot bring your own user database (no self-hosted data store)
  • –Webhooks are not very customizable
WorkOS logoWorkOS
  • +First 1 million AuthKit MAUs are free, one of the most generous free tiers in the auth market
  • +Excellent, developer-friendly documentation repeatedly praised in G2 reviews
  • +Admin Portal lets customers' IT admins self-serve their own SSO/SCIM setup, cutting vendor support load
  • –Per-connection SSO/Directory Sync pricing ($125/connection/mo) scales with customer count, not revenue, the most common complaint
  • –A single SSO customer can cost more than a SaaS vendor's own lowest-tier plan, blocking SSO-on-all-tiers strategies
  • –Surrounding features, SDKs and docs described as having 'paper cuts', less mature than Auth0/Okta in places

Frontegg vs WorkOS: questions

Which has better documentation, Frontegg or WorkOS?
WorkOS scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 90 vs 78 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Frontegg or WorkOS?
WorkOS scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 75 out of 100.
Do Frontegg and WorkOS have a free tier?
Frontegg: yes (7.5k MAU (free tier)). WorkOS: yes (Up to 1M MAU on AuthKit; $125/connection for SSO/SCIM).
How are Frontegg and WorkOS priced?
Frontegg: MAU-based (+ feature add-ons). WorkOS: Per connection / MAU-based.
Which has more official SDKs?
WorkOS lists 12 official SDKs, Frontegg lists 10.

Other Authentication & Identity comparisons