Head to head

Firebase Authentication vs Supabase Auth

As a authentication & identity API, Firebase Authentication rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 87.6 to 82.2, a 5.4-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

87.6ABI / 100

Mobile/web auth inside Firebase

Supabase Auth logoB
82.2ABI / 100

Postgres-native auth in an OSS BaaS

Criterion by criterion

CriterionFirebase AuthenticationSupabase Auth
Documentation & DX
85
84
Reliability
90
76
Ecosystem & SDKs
88
80
Accessibility
88
90
APIbenchmarks Index87.682.2

Specifications

Firebase AuthenticationSupabase Auth
Best forMobile/web auth inside FirebasePostgres-native auth in an OSS BaaS
Free tier50k MAU (basic email/social)50k MAU (Free plan)
PricingMAU-based (+ per-SMS)MAU-based (+ platform fee)
Official SDKs11 languages6 languages

Is Firebase Authentication better than Supabase Auth?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Firebase Authentication rates higher (87.6 vs 82.2). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Firebase Authentication leads by 5.4 points (87.6 vs 82.2) and wins 3 of 4 criteria; Supabase Auth wins 1.

Winner by criterion

CriterionFirebase Authentication logoFirebase AuthenticationSupabase Auth logoSupabase AuthWinner
Documentation & DX8584Firebase Authentication logoFirebase Authentication
Reliability9076Firebase Authentication logoFirebase Authentication
Ecosystem & SDKs8880Firebase Authentication logoFirebase Authentication
Accessibility8890Supabase Auth logoSupabase Auth
Firebase Authentication vs Supabase Auth API comparison: ABI 87.6 vs 82.2; documentation & dx 85 vs 84, reliability 90 vs 76, ecosystem & sdks 88 vs 80, accessibility 88 vs 90.
Firebase Authentication vs Supabase Auth API comparison: ABI 87.6 vs 82.2; documentation & dx 85 vs 84, reliability 90 vs 76, ecosystem & sdks 88 vs 80, accessibility 88 vs 90.

Choose Firebase Authentication if… / choose Supabase Auth if…

Firebase Authentication logoChoose Firebase Authentication if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (85 vs 84)
  • →reliability matters most to you (90 vs 76)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (88 vs 80)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (11 official SDKs vs 6)
  • →your use case matches its focus: mobile/web auth inside firebase
Supabase Auth logoChoose Supabase Auth if
  • →accessibility matters most to you (90 vs 88)
  • →your use case matches its focus: postgres-native auth in an oss baas

Pricing side by side

Firebase Authentication logoFirebase Authentication
Model
MAU-based (+ per-SMS)
Free tier
50k MAU (basic email/social)
  • No-cost tier (Spark / Blaze free allowance)$0
  • Standard MAU (Blaze, 50,001–100,000)$0.0055 / MAU
  • Standard MAU (100,001–1,000,000)$0.0046 / MAU
  • Standard MAU (1,000,001–10,000,000)$0.0032 / MAU
  • Enterprise SSO (SAML / OIDC)$0.015 / MAU
  • Phone / SMS authentication~$0.01–$0.06 / SMS
Supabase Auth logoSupabase Auth
Model
MAU-based (+ platform fee)
Free tier
50k MAU (Free plan)
  • Free$0/mo
  • Pro$25/mo
  • Team$599/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Firebase Authentication) and 2026-06-27 (Supabase Auth).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 0
None
Only Firebase Authentication · 11
iOS (Swift/Objective-C)Android (Kotlin/Java)Web (JavaScript)Flutter (Dart)UnityC++Admin SDK: Node.jsAdmin SDK: JavaAdmin SDK: PythonAdmin SDK: GoREST API
Only Supabase Auth · 6
JavaScript / TypeScriptFlutter / DartSwiftKotlinPythonC# (.NET)

Strengths and weaknesses

Firebase Authentication logoFirebase Authentication
  • +50,000 free monthly active users plus cheap graduated per-MAU pricing makes it very low cost for consumer apps
  • +Extremely fast to integrate, working auth in a few lines of code, with an optional FirebaseUI drop-in widget
  • +Broad first-party SDK coverage: iOS, Android, Web, Flutter, Unity, C++, and Admin SDKs for Node, Java, Python, Go
  • –Limited customization of auth flows and hosted UI; the SMS template and FirebaseUI widget cannot be meaningfully changed
  • –Significant vendor lock-in, historically no clean user-export API and the Firebase UID is hard to map back when migrating off
  • –Enterprise features (SAML/OIDC, MFA, SLA, real support) require the paid Identity Platform tier
Supabase Auth logoSupabase Auth
  • +Deep Postgres Row-Level Security integration: JWT claims are usable directly inside SQL policies for DB-layer authorization
  • +Very generous free tier (50,000 MAU) and low overage pricing ($0.00325/MAU) versus Auth0/Okta
  • +Broad auth methods out of the box: password, magic link, OTP, phone, anonymous, dozens of social OAuth providers, plus TOTP/phone MFA
  • –B2C-first: no first-class Organizations model and no SCIM provisioning for B2B tenancy
  • –SAML/OIDC support is comparatively immature; SSO gated to Pro and above
  • –No adaptive/risk-based MFA or bot-detection capabilities

Firebase Authentication vs Supabase Auth: questions

Which has better documentation, Firebase Authentication or Supabase Auth?
Firebase Authentication scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 85 vs 84 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Firebase Authentication or Supabase Auth?
Firebase Authentication scores higher on reliability: 90 vs 76 out of 100.
Do Firebase Authentication and Supabase Auth have a free tier?
Firebase Authentication: yes (50k MAU (basic email/social)). Supabase Auth: yes (50k MAU (Free plan)).
How are Firebase Authentication and Supabase Auth priced?
Firebase Authentication: MAU-based (+ per-SMS). Supabase Auth: MAU-based (+ platform fee).
Which has more official SDKs?
Firebase Authentication lists 11 official SDKs, Supabase Auth lists 6.

Other Authentication & Identity comparisons